Talk:Donkey Kong 64: Difference between revisions
Fawfulfury65 (talk | contribs) (→Minigames: question, please answer.) |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Ok, I think we need to remove the table [[Donkey Kong 64#Levels and Golden Bananas|this section]]. I know some user(s) worked very hard on it, but the Mariowiki is a Mario encyclopedia, and it shouldn't have the walkthrough on a whole entire game. Plus, it looks like it hasn't been touched in what seems like months (besides when I fixed a bunch of grammar errors this morning). And as of now, the table seems horribly cluttered and still has several spelling and grammar errors in it (even though it could be fixed at some point). Basically, though, I think we should either delete the whole table, or at lease merge it with [[Golden Banana]]. I not sure if I really need to make a whole proposal about this so... What do other people think? {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | Ok, I think we need to remove the table [[Donkey Kong 64#Levels and Golden Bananas|this section]]. I know some user(s) worked very hard on it, but the Mariowiki is a Mario encyclopedia, and it shouldn't have the walkthrough on a whole entire game. Plus, it looks like it hasn't been touched in what seems like months (besides when I fixed a bunch of grammar errors this morning). And as of now, the table seems horribly cluttered and still has several spelling and grammar errors in it (even though it could be fixed at some point). Basically, though, I think we should either delete the whole table, or at lease merge it with [[Golden Banana]]. I not sure if I really need to make a whole proposal about this so... What do other people think? {{User:Fawfulfury65/sig}} | ||
:I think that it should be deleted or better merged...--{{User:MATEOELBACAN/sig}} 16:57, 14 February 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:57, February 14, 2010
Is this page still under contruction? I was thinking about nominating this for FAs. HyperToad
- On a first view, the Crystal Caves and Creepy Castle sections of the table are still empty. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 12:03, 24 January 2008 (EST)\
- Is that even really needed? It's seems too much like a Game Guide. HyperToad
- I worked too hard on the Golden banana Guide to have it deleted -- WarioLoaf (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, actually I'd say keep it. I'll fill those slots in when I get time. HyperToad@Donkey Kong 64
- Yeah, actually I'd say keep it. I'll fill those slots in when I get time. HyperToad@Donkey Kong 64
This game doesn't break the Fourth Wall?
I was looking around the Wiki & I found a...list thing that says "Games That Break The Fourth Wall" &, um...this game wasn't on it. I have evidence suggesting it does.
- 1: Cranky says "Silly 3-D Quest"
- 2: In the Wrestling Match at the end of the game, the worm/microphone announcer-thing says, "Welcome to the main event of the game!...Brought to you by Nintendo and Rareware in association with K.Rool Enterprises."
Are those not Fourth Wall breaks? I'd've said this somewhere else, but those list things don't exactly have discussion pages, now do they?
And if you don't believe me, go to Youtube. I'm currently uploading a game of Donkey Kong 64 over there.
--Litnin200
Yes to #1 and yes to #2. It breaks the fourth wall. I believe there are more fourth wall breaks as well. HyperToad@Donkey Kong 64
Minigames
Can I have the a-ok to make articles on minigames? HyperToad@Donkey Kong 64
Golden Banana Table
Ok, I think we need to remove the table this section. I know some user(s) worked very hard on it, but the Mariowiki is a Mario encyclopedia, and it shouldn't have the walkthrough on a whole entire game. Plus, it looks like it hasn't been touched in what seems like months (besides when I fixed a bunch of grammar errors this morning). And as of now, the table seems horribly cluttered and still has several spelling and grammar errors in it (even though it could be fixed at some point). Basically, though, I think we should either delete the whole table, or at lease merge it with Golden Banana. I not sure if I really need to make a whole proposal about this so... What do other people think? Fawfulfury65
- I think that it should be deleted or better merged...--Mateo (Talk · Contributions) 16:57, 14 February 2010 (EST)
