MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!" "Vote" periods last for one week. Any past proposals are archived. A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument. Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at: Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm) Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm) Sunday: 15:00 (3pm) At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has strong reasons supporting it. Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line. At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community. A user calls the result of the proposal and takes action(s) as decided if necessary, and archives the proposal. The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. CURRENTLY: 03:21, 10 May 2024 (EDT) New Features Add Banjo-Kazooie Artciles The RecentAdd Banjo - Conker Articles proposer was denied, mainly because of Conker. People thought that he was either too mature, or too hfar removed. Banjo however, has no such problems. His games have all been rated E so far, and the inclusion of Tiptup in Diddy Kong Racing, Diddy Kong Racing DS, Banjo-Kazooie, and Banjo-Tooie, Seems to me worthy to merit Babjo for inclusion on this wiki. As previously stated, Tiptup's appearence in BK - BT was not a cameo- he was alive , and tangible. Nor was it a simple cross-over: Banjo's first appearence was DKR, making the series a SPINOFF of Mario. Other series that included Mario characters/enemies (LoZ,F-Zero, Tetris....) were made with there title characters first appearing in one of there own games. Sooo... vote, and all. Proposer: UltimateToad Deadline: 4:00 P.M. Saturday Spetember 29th Add Banjo Articles Ultimatetoad Mr.Benio 08:37, 26 September 2007 (EDT): Yes! Even my brother has been thinking if Banjo-Kazooie articles should be made for a long time now. I even have more proof: In Donkey Kong's room in DK64, there is a locker with a picture of Banj and Kazooie's heads on the side. Not, only that, but one of the mole children from Banjo-Tooies was holding a DK doll! There are connections! Keep Them Out Son of Suns - Conker is as connected as Banjo is. Both franchises developed out of the DK series, and both live in the same universe as Donkey and Diddy Kong. I don't think it is fair to have one without the other. If Conker's out, Bajo's getting the door slammed in his face as well. Plumber 08:07, 23 September 2007 (EDT) Cobold (talk · contribs) - They are still too far from the Mario series, Tiptup doesn't change that, his only "Mario" appearance was Diddy Kong Racing (DS), too. Walkazo - Per Cobold. YELLOWYOSHI398 – Per SoS. Comments Removals Changes It's not just America This is something that upsets me greatly almost everywhere, not just on this site; people seem to assume that the only place where games are released in English is America. In most of the profiles here, things are said to have happened in "the American version." I want this stopped; it's not fair on other English-speaking countries. It should be refferred to as the "English version," or at the very least, "the American and European version." Proposer: Davidk92 Deadline: 21:26 EDT Support Davidk92 - My reasons given above. Oppose Comments "Representing" Many articles say they look similar or represent when just because they are the same representing species. For an example, Sidestepper's trivia says that they resemble Dovo, however they don't. Dovos do not like anything like a Sidestepper, and they probably weren't even remembering Sidesteppers when making the game. Sure, some represent other things, but not most of them. I'm saying to remove the trivia that says that they represent these that aren't truly representing. Proposper: Minimariolover10 Deadline: 11:59 PM EDT Support File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! My reasons given above Oppose Son of Suns - I don't think this is worthy of a proposal. If you feel something doesn't look like something else, just remove the trivia, or debate it on the talk page. A lot of enemies do resemble each other, and the Super Mario Wiki attempts to make connections between enemies and games. Glowsquid - What SOS said. Cobold (talk · contribs) - This should be decided separately for each case. Also, Trivia sections should be limited to a minimum. Plumber Per Cobold Walkazo - Per SOS and Cobold. YELLOWYOSHI398 – Per SoS and Cobold. Your Dovo/Sidestepper thing was a good example of a possibly unnecessary Trivia entry, but it's probably something that shouldn't be taken to Proposals. Comments Yes, I know, but in some cases it isn't connecting. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!!And about it not being worthy, I want other users to know SOME don't look similar so they could clear it if another doing this job is missing it. Therefore you should be bold. Not everything needs a proposal. Make the changes you feel are correct. -- Son of Suns Subsized Categorys Every once in a while, a category that can have too few enteries shows up. Such as Category:X-Naut's Weapons (Though it's deleted), so I think that those should be prevented like stub articles. Proposer: Lario Deadline: 20:00, 22 September 2007 Prevent Them Mr. Guy the Guy Talk!E This is important Keep Them They are still categories. I think that stuff like that should exist if it's not only one article.  Caps Lock LORD 13:24, 16 September 2007 (EDT) Comments I think we should just do a case by case basis, like new articles. We ask: "Is there enough for its inclusion?" There's no way to prevent someone from creating categories - we just have to decide if they are needed when it happens. I don't think this proposal can do much, so I am not voting either way. -- Son of Suns I agree. - Walkazo Improvement Drive Idea I think we should have a project similar to Featured Articles and the Pipe Plaza, where, instead of pointing out the best articles, we point out the ones that need Work, so users can all work on one project, instead of everyone editing the "featured article" status ones, and leaving articles like Doopliss un-edited. The process would be similar to Featured Articles. We make a new page about the project, where we come together and list the articles we think are shortest, but have potential. Then, we might make a box on the main page to show what the article is. Each article will get one week on the main page, again, similar to Featured Articles. I know no-one may say yes cause I'm not someone who edits, but I think this would help users, ecspecially new users, who may be nervous making an article. This does not mean we will have stub articles, and I frankly think this project will prevent them. Proposer: Max2 Deadline: 20:00, 22 September 2007 Give it a Try Max2 (talk) Supporter, reasons given above ~Uniju(T-C-E) Sounds like a good idea! ~PY -Per Max2 Minimariolover10 I agree. It won't fail. Plus, we have no idea what to edit, and recently messages aren't replying fast. Peachycakes 3.14 06:57, 17 September 2007 (EDT) I'll help, it seems like a neat idea. CaptainN I think that would help! Per Max2.  Caps Lock LORD 14:13, 21 September 2007 (EDT) Frum LANKY KONG ! I think it's a great idea, and could work. YELLOWYOSHI398 – Sounds good. It's at least worth a try. Nah Plumber These projects always seem to fail. I don't think we're ready for it yet. XzelionETC See my comments Comments Are you thinking about something like MarioWiki: PAIR; or an Improvement Drive, where we pick one article a week or month, feature it somewhere and encourage all users to work on it? Or are you thinking something else? It would be nice to get a better sense of what you are thinking, cause I am all for helping users getting active and making improvements. -- Son of Suns Yeah, an Improvement Drive. That's exactly what I mean! Max2 (talk) Okay. I think you need to clarify some points. You should state above what this would entaiil exactly. For starters, you can answer these questions and put them in the proposal itself. Would users vote for an article to be improved (the one with the most votes gets featured)? Would the article be featured for a week, a month, etc.? And would the article be featured on the main page (like, This Week (or month)'s Collaboration is: so and so) with a link to that page? -- Son of Suns Ok. Is this clarified enough? Max2 (talk) I added descriptions of the aspects of the project, how to set it up, and why I think it would work. Yes. That makes sense. One more question: would one of the secondary goals be to get improvement drive articles to FA standards, if the subject is notable? (An aside: even Doopliss is a notable subject - it could become an FA.) -- Son of Suns Well, as most users say, the goal for every article would be to become an FA. i'm ont saying we only improve articles that can be FA articles, this is mainly just to cut back on stubs and short articles. Max2 (talk) That makes sense. I wish you the best of luck with this project. I don't know how I feel about this yet, as previous improvement drive/collaboration projects have failed. We'll see what happens. =) -- Son of Suns It seems to be sort of popular with the crowd. Except Plumber. Max2 (talk) Projects like this have been tried before and failed, perhaps we should wait till we have a larger community and more editors. XzelionETC I wish more people knew about MarioWiki at MFGG, then we'd sure get a lot of new users! Though I hope kingmetroid doesn't come. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! While many simillar idea have all been tried (and failed miserably.), this one seem to actually have a decent following, why not give it a try? Glowsquid Who would head this project? Max? XzelionETC I guess I would. or let someone else take over it if they want. And, Xz, this wouldn't fail. We might not get every article up to like FA Status, but people will work on it. I also know me being in charge was likely a "no" factor, and I'm not saying to change your vote, only that the whole thing is actually well thought out and simple enough that anybody could join in on it. Max2 (talk) Walkthrougth-style level article. Most article about level's are fine, however a few (BLIZZARD!!! is a big offender.) read like something out of a player guide. Level articles should state: Where it take place. The enemies that are in it. The special gimmick (If there's one.) This is an encyclopedia, an article shouldn't tell where to find that last Flower or how to defeat Koin. If I want that kind of information, I'll go on Gamefaq. Proposer: Glowsquid Deadline: September 30, 15:00 EDT Prevent the creation of that kind of article and rewrite those already here. Glowsquid I am the proposer and my reasons are given above. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!!Glowsquid is correct. This isn't The Mario Online Encylepedia of Guides minus the bad name. Sure, non-rpg enemies can have it, but levels are wrong. ChaosNinji Per Minimariolover10 My Bloody Valentine Walkthrough doesn't work. Encyclopedia style does. Walkazo There are plenty of websites dedicated to Walkthroughs, Super Mario Wiki is here to focus on plot, setting and character. XzelionETC Per all, Seems too Game FAQy. Mewtwo49 I agree. This isn't IGN. Walkthrough level articles should be rewritten. BLIZZARD!! is WAAY too long! Allow the creation of this style of article. Son of Suns - Well I do agree many of these level articles need to be re-written in a more formal and in-universe tone, anything that happens in the level is official, and should be reported. This is an internet encyclopedia, so we can have as much info as possible on any subject. Plus, info from player's guides is official, so why shouldn't it be included here? However, maybe the level articles should have a special "Expanded Walthrough" section or something so users don't have to read the walkthrough if they don't want to. Mr.Vruet info|talk|chat - Per Son of Suns Mr. Guy the Guy Talk!E - If no guide they'de all be either a bit short or stubs! Booster - Per Son of Suns. Yes, I usually tend to agree with him. I guess we think alike. Peachycakes 3.14 Per Son of Sons YELLOWYOSHI398 – We shouldn't go too in-depth, but a quick walkthrough strikes me as fine. Comments SoS: There is a distinction betweeen describing what happen in a level and telling the reader what to do. Describing how the level jump from a fortress theme to a lava theme, forest theme... ect and what happen in each portion is interessing and encyclopedic. However, telling the reader how to get the DK Coin hiden by the Zinger in Castle Crush isn't encyclopedic. How is the fact that the fith Red Coin can only be accessed by geting the key and killing the Coin Bandit behind the door encyclopedic and revalent to the Marioverse? I agree we should describe in-depth, but we shouldn't go overboard. Sincerely, Glowsquid I definitely agree the style needs to be changed for a lot of articles, instead of describing what to do, one should describe what's in the level. However, what is "encyclopedic" for a wiki about a video game series? You can't pick up a "G" encyclopedia and find a GO! GO! MARIO!! entry. We have nothing to emulate, so saying it is unencyclopedic is a moot point. What we do know is that everything in the level exists in the Marioverse, and is therefore relevant. -- Son of Suns Well, most encyclopedia have an entry about a notable park, do said encyclopedia tell you to cross the rivers and other natural obstacle as well as giving tip like "Bring your map!" while giving away the location of every single tree/rock? No? Well, that's the same thing here. Mushroom Way is a great example of what we should do for stage writting, it's very detailled and yet, it don't use walkthrought-style writting (Kill that guy, go punch that block for X reward... ect.) - - Glowsquid Ah. That makes more sense. Still, I don't think new articles should be prevented because they have a different style. They are two different ways of showing the same information. We shouldn't stop an article from being created when we need the information, regardless of what form it's in. -- Son of Suns Well, by "preventing", I don't mean deleting the article and warn the user who created it, but rather add the rewrite tag and (maybe) give the user a small reminder about how he should avoid this style of writting. That how it should be done, IMO. - - Glowsquid Also, if we just ignore this, the Wiki will be scrap full because of some levels not like this, while a bunch are, making it a mess! We must get rid of all walkthrough to make it seem more perfersonal, like Wikipedia itself. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! Lario: Not really, a level article can be detailed without having to read like a walkthrought. I think I'll do an example. Detailled Style (Note, all of this is amde up.): "Grab these Coins!" is the sixth level of World 2 in Yoshi's Revenge. The level initially start out in a castle filled with lava, however, the subsequent section take place in a cave full of Bandits." ect. Walthrought-style: "Yoshi should jump on the raillift paltfrom above to gain acces to a bunch of red-coins, try to avoid the jumping sparky and try to defeat all the Fly-Guys holding the red-coins. Then, jump on all the Para-Troopa to get the flower..." ect. (I think you get the idea.) See? You can have plenty of info without making it seem like a walkthrought. - Glowsquid I am striking my vote through, so it won't count in the end, but I want my original reasonings to stay. Also, others agree with my original assessment, that a walkthrough style article is fine, and their votes are still valid. As Glowsquid stated, articles like this won't be deleted on sight, so I don't mind what the wiki decides on how these articles are written. I doesn't matter to me whether they are walkthrough style or not, just as long as they are not deleted. -- Son of Suns Merges and Splits Recipes Pages Almost all of the Recipe Articles are short and state: What Game What Effect How to get the item Picture All which would be included in a table. Table shown here, Credit to SpikeKnifeNeedleSword for the design. This would work such as the Badges page. Lets face it they're too minor and too many of them. Proposer: XzelionETC (started by SpikeKnifeNeedleSword (talk)) Deadline: 17:00, 19 September Merge XzelionETC My Reasons are stated above. Bastila Shan Xzelion is right Cobold (talk · contribs) - Though items which can be gotten without cooking, such as the Boo's Sheet, should still have their own article. Keep Separate Son of Suns - As officially named items they should be kept. They have just as much info as any other item in the series. They are exactly the same as regular items: what game, what effect, how to get the item, and a picture. Look at the Strange Leaf article, a normal item used for recipes. It is exactly what is in a recipe article, or any other item article for that matter. Full Metal Moogle - We have articles for other items, dont we? D: ~Uniju(T-C-E) All items should get an article, since a lot of them can be gotten by cooking, AND by finding them somewhere not to mention some other reason... *Talks for hours*. Aipom Per SoS. Plumber Per that Pokemon YELLOWYOSHI398 – Per SoS. Booster - Per SoS. They qualify for seperate articles, as they are officially named, and they have different effects, unlike say Wario game treasures. Glowsquid - Per Booster. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! Bad idea to merge them all, because they have each have a chart, and some don't causing it to be rather messy and would even longer then the Jump article! Comments Son of Sun: Your example would be a little more convincing if you didn't purposely choose a stub. For normal items, you can talk about were they are found, if they are revallant to the plot (Like the Dried Shroom) ,how you can obtain them apart for beating up random enemy, and how they can be used for cooking. For a recipe, you simply say which item can be used for cooking them and their effects, deffinately a table job IMO. Glowsquid I think there's been some confusion between recipes and food items. As far as I know, Recipes are "Item 1 + Item 2 = Item 3", not the food items involved, which is what seems to be the common belief (Food Items are even categorized as Recipies, which makes no sence). I'll use the Dried Shroom article to highlight my point: The text part is about the item Dried Shroom, and the "Recipes" secion is a list of the recipes it's used in. Make a list of the recipes, but keep the articles about the items. - Walkazo Look at the Shroom Steak article. There's numerous ways to make one. If we were to list all possible ways of making each item, the chart would be huge. Also, a list makes it harder to describe items in detail, such as is it worth the money to cook, or is it unworthy, and should only be made once just for the recipe log? Booster There are problems on with both solutions. The current way, we have a high number of articles that are just a few words shy of stub-status (EX: Fried Shroom). The other way, we end up with a handful of very, very long articles (EX: Shroom Steak). We need to find a middle ground. -- Chris 20:01, 17 September 2007 (EDT) List of Mario Kart Sponsor Some day ago, Wayoshi deleted an article about Wario Mall, an organization briefly mentioned on a spot in Mario:Kart DS. The Mario Kart series is FULL of random sponsors. I thought we could create a list of these organization of one page, since they do exist, but aren't major enough to have their own articles. Proposer: Glowsquid Deadline: 17:00, 19 September Create that list Glowsquid XzelionETC Per Glowsquid Bastila Shan What gofer Said Cobold (talk · contribs) - Too minor to warrant articles. Walkazo- Good idea. ~Uniju(T-C-E) - Sounds like a neat idea! Aipom Per Glowsquid. Snack 20:55, 14 September 2007 (EDT) Sounds like a great idea. Like Cobold said, they are way too minor to have their own articles, but one big list of them would be great. Plumber 02:10, 15 September 2007 (EDT) I think I was going to do this a long time ago, but wasn't sure if they should be on a list or not. Now I've made my decision. YELLOWYOSHI398 – This is a great idea; Mario Kart sponsors aren't worthy of their own articles, but a list would be fine. Master Crash Ya, i've always wanted somethin like this. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! Why go through article after article? Plus, I have slow internet connection. I mean, whoever known Wario was a maller? I'll help because I have all Mario Karts except for Wii (duh), Super, and Super Circuit. User:Lario Per everyone above Ghost Jam - As long as it's kept to only a list, I see no problem. Nay Comments I've gathered up most of the things. Though, I probably missed some, including Wario Mall. But a huge in order (except for Nintendo and Mario Kart) is: Super Mario Shoot!! Dangerous!!! Peach Grand Prix Yoshi's Egg Grand Prix Super Mario GP Super Mushroom Luigi Tires Wario Waluigi GP Yoshi Kart Sunshine Parts Mario Kart Daisy Delfino Fruits Koopa Shop Nintendo Waluigi Pinball Waluigi Sport Wario Racing Snowman Skating Rink Koopa Kart Super Star! Wario GP Koopa Sport Moo Moo Farm Is this most of it? I went trough EVERY course and try looking for them. File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! Do'h! I forgot. These are the only ones I found in Mario Kart DS. Sorry! I know they're more! File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! I could try looking for adds in Mario Kart: Double Dash!! (I already do it for fun anyway), but that's the only Mario Kary game I have other than DS. - Walkazo Do it! And don't pic random order, do it in order, because the past stuff in Mario Kart DS don't advertise. Maybe my bro SonicMario and I can do race to double search in Mario Kart 64. Does anyone have Super Circuit or the first one? File:MiniMario.pngMinimariolover10 TALK TO ME ABOUT MINIES!! I have the original, and it don't have any kind of sponsor in it. I have Super Circuit (And pretty much every games in thes series except GP, infact. Glowsquid OK. Does someone live near an arcade that has Mario Kart GP? There's gotts to be at least one! This is pretty big, and if someone makes the article add {{construction}} because there have got to be more. Miscellaneous Pers, I agrees... Okay every time I go on here I noticed several users say "Per ___" "I agree" or "___ is right" but I think these shouldn't be said all the time because whoever say those are to lazy to think of something. Proposer: Mr. Guy Deadline: 2 October 17:00 EDT. Prevent constant these Mr. Guy the Guy Talk!E - These are plain annoying Just let them YELLOWYOSHI398 – I don't see how they're really a problem. They're still reasons; they're done simply because people do agree and don't want to completely repeat each other, not because they're too lazy to think of something. Peachycakes 3.14 Ironicly, Per YY Cobold (talk · contribs) - When you force everyone to make up their own reasons, you have a set limited number of votes there can be. Ghost Jam per Cobold. We have so few active users, limiting ourselves further is suicide. Per YY398. --KPH2293 Walkazo - A lot of the time whatever comment I would've made has already been said, it'd be stupid to say the exact same thing, and as YY398 said, way to repetative. By saying Per_ or whatever we're proving that we actually read through it all and thought about it before signing our names. How's that lazy? Comments And by the way, you shouldn't call others "lazy" when you're not adding a "Comment" headline, not making a line break, not even filling in the deadline. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 10:41, 25 September 2007 (EDT) Yeah, and shouldn't this be under Miscellaneous? It's not exactly a removal. - Walkazo Yes, it should and has been moved accordingly. -- Chris 23:15, 25 September 2007 (EDT)