MarioWiki:Main Page talk archive 29: Difference between revisions
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
:I don't really like this style. It doesn't leave any room to explain the etymology. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 22:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | :I don't really like this style. It doesn't leave any room to explain the etymology. {{User:Twentytwofiftyseven/sig}} 22:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::The English name's meaning is also often explained in the Trivia section rather than the lead. Or what do you mean? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 10:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | ::The English name's meaning is also often explained in the Trivia section rather than the lead. Or what do you mean? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 10:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::The English name is explained in the Trivia section because there isn't a template for explaining it. We have a template to put names in languages other than English in and explain their meaning though, so I don't really see why we wouldn't use it. Even if the Japanese name is the original one, it's still a name in another language on an English-language Wiki, so I feel it makes sense to have it in the section for Names in Other Languages (which is how most articles currently handle it); given the section's heading, most people would probably look there first when looking for names in other languages, and it feels more organised that way to me.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 14:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:52, August 23, 2010
Welcome to Main Page talk. This is where technical issues go. For all general questions, please visit the FAQ.
Poll Selection
So, since the polls are back, shouldn't we use the Poll Selection page again? 
MrConcreteDonkey
- No, because there is a committee of users in charge of selecting polls now. · SMB (Talk) · 22:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
problem
I don't know if this happens to anyone else but where the polls are, the box is cut off so I can't read it. 
GalacticPetey
- HMm... can you post a screenshot, please? --
™ The 'Shroom 18:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
The new Main Page...
...looks awesome! I wasn't a big fan of removing FIs and even I have to say this is amazing. Great job there, guys. Template:Color-link-pipedFile:Star.PNGTemplate:Color-link-piped 22:49, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- All credit goes to Steve :) --™ The 'Shroom 19:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Noob question: How do I change the poll so it appears instead of just "Link" and "Surveys"? 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 22:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- NO script is doing it. Allow PollDaddy.com and see if it works.
Oh. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:10, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Five Years as of 78 minutes ago!
Congratulations MarioWiki! Wa 
TC@Y 19:05, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's called a "party favor." *throws bob-ombs everywhere and everything explodes*
WAHOO! 5 YEARS! WE SURVIVED 5 YEARS! CRANK UP THE BASS MAN! GalacticPetey
Happy birthday Mario Wiki! This is a present for ya.(the bob omb may explode at any time...hihi...)
Nice Present! Hey everyone! Lets all do the Mario! GalacticPetey
Wow, amazing! 5 years... not as easy as they seem. Congratulations MarioWiki and Steve. Now let's go for another 5! --™ The 'Shroom 02:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Happy Birthday MarioWiki! Fawfulfury65
- Another year older, ha ha ha.
Happy birthday Super Mario Wiki!!! Here's to 5 awesome years of a truly "Super" Wiki! (Spot the bad joke.) *Accidentally steps on Bob-Omb while celebrating* 
This Is War 13:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
What a coincidence, today (GMT) is Friday the 13th, wow. Not that I'm superstitious anyway
Image Glich
On the Unused files page, there are two images at the top: one of a green Yoshi and one of a purple Yoshi. They are unnecessary, so I want to delete them. But for some reason, I can't edit it. I can only "create" it. Anybody know why? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Well, I've "restored" the images. So they should technically exist now. --Steve (talk)
02:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Foreign names in the opening paragraph
There's an inconsistency in the opening paragraphs of the articles I noticed: In not so many, but still in a notable number of articles, the Japanese name is mentioned in the lead. Actually, I'm perfectly with that, as the Japanese name is the original one in most cases and therefore deserves this treatment. What about adding the name used for the original (not generally Japanese) version to the articles? Like how it is done at Bulbapedia, e.g. "Midbus (Japanese: メタボス Metaboss)". On the other hand, Krow would actually not need his Japanese name in the lead, as he was created by Rare. Episodes of the Donkey Kong Country animated series would have the French name in the lead, as French is the show's original language. Any thoughts? At least there should be consistency on this. --Grandy02 21:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- I don't really like this style. It doesn't leave any room to explain the etymology. - 2257(Talk) 22:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- The English name's meaning is also often explained in the Trivia section rather than the lead. Or what do you mean? --Grandy02 10:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- The English name is explained in the Trivia section because there isn't a template for explaining it. We have a template to put names in languages other than English in and explain their meaning though, so I don't really see why we wouldn't use it. Even if the Japanese name is the original one, it's still a name in another language on an English-language Wiki, so I feel it makes sense to have it in the section for Names in Other Languages (which is how most articles currently handle it); given the section's heading, most people would probably look there first when looking for names in other languages, and it feels more organised that way to me.--vellidragon 14:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- The English name's meaning is also often explained in the Trivia section rather than the lead. Or what do you mean? --Grandy02 10:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
