Talk:Banjo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hmm... there's so much gray area with this... maybe we should just call them 3rd party to be sure. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT) | Hmm... there's so much gray area with this... maybe we should just call them 3rd party to be sure. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 00:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Every character owned by Rare is considered third-party.{{User:Knife/sig}} 13:18, 11 June 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:18, June 11, 2007
3rd Party Characters?
Since Rareware has officially left Nintendo and taken Banjo and Conker with them, would those characters be "3rd Party Characters" now? Stumpers! 16:09, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
I'm not really sure, since they haven't actually appeared in an Extended Marioverse game since becoming third-party characters, should they be counted as them? - Sir Grodus
That's what I think, anyway. Remember, they got over-written in Diddy Kong Racing DS if you see that as a replacement for the original. It would seem that they really have no connection anymore, not even the connection that 3rd Party Characters are implied to have. Stumpers! 16:30, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
They're ex-2nd party characters at best. Booster
Hmm... there's so much gray area with this... maybe we should just call them 3rd party to be sure. Stumpers! 00:42, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
Every character owned by Rare is considered third-party.Knife (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
