MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I went through it, that rewrite bar shouldn't have been there. I removed it.
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I went through it, that rewrite bar shouldn't have been there. I removed it.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The article has minor grammar problems, but the errors are not enough for the article to unfeatured.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The article has minor grammar problems, but the errors are not enough for the article to unfeatured.
#{{User|Ultramariologan}} I went through the article; it was long and it had nice images. Per my comment below also.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
Line 16: Line 17:
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - Incorrect, there is no template there :)
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - Incorrect, there is no template there :)
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I know, it's simple like that. There is no rewrite template. Unless there is an invisible one. In case of that... well... they're not allowed. *winks*
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I know, it's simple like that. There is no rewrite template. Unless there is an invisible one. In case of that... well... they're not allowed. *winks*
#{{User|Ultramariologan}} Like all of the above, it is incorrect. There is NO rewrite template.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
You know, you could've tried fixing such a minor problem yourself... >_< {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
You know, you could've tried fixing such a minor problem yourself... >_< {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
Why does this article even NEED to be unfeatured just because it has a rewrite bar? {{User|Ultramariologan}}

Revision as of 19:29, January 8, 2011

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Nicke8 (talk)It has a rewrite bar.

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Marioguy1 (talk) - I went through it, that rewrite bar shouldn't have been there. I removed it.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The article has minor grammar problems, but the errors are not enough for the article to unfeatured.
  3. Ultramariologan (talk) I went through the article; it was long and it had nice images. Per my comment below also.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Nicke8

  1. Marioguy1 (talk) - Incorrect, there is no template there :)
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I know, it's simple like that. There is no rewrite template. Unless there is an invisible one. In case of that... well... they're not allowed. *winks*
  3. Ultramariologan (talk) Like all of the above, it is incorrect. There is NO rewrite template.

Comments

You know, you could've tried fixing such a minor problem yourself... >_< LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Why does this article even NEED to be unfeatured just because it has a rewrite bar? Ultramariologan (talk)