MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Goomba: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Goomba (edit)

Revision as of 10:26, May 1, 2023

2,074 bytes added , 1 year ago

m

no edit summary

Porplemontage

Bureaucrats, Proprietor, Administrators

42,399

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
-===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
+{{UNFANOMFAIL
+|nominated=10:56, April 20, 2012
-{{UNFANOMSTAT
+|lastedit=01:06, January 01, 2013
-|nominated=10:56, 20 April 2012 (EDT)
+|nosupport=false
-|passed=
-<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
 }}
 ==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
-#{{User|987li}}[[Goomba|This article]] has mostly perfect grammar, spelling and use of punctuation. It has a great use of links and images. As with [[MW:CITE]], it shows that articles with information that is in an in-universe style provided from a source from the game (all of Goomba's roles in the games) itself does '''not''' need to be sourced. However, information that is provided outside the games, such as "Trivia" and "Names in other languages" (sections) are not sourced.
+#{{User|987li}}[[Goomba|This article]] has mostly perfect grammar, spelling and use of punctuation. It has a great use of links and images. As with [[SMW:CITE]], it shows that articles with information that is in an in-universe style provided from a source from the game (all of Goomba's roles in the games) itself does '''not''' need to be sourced. However, information that is provided outside the games, such as "Trivia" and "Names in other languages" (sections) are not sourced.
 ==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
@@ Line 17: / Line 15: @@
 #{{User|MarioSmasher}} Do we need even sources '''for names in other languages and for the trivia?!''' You know it, you can prove the trivia by playing the games, and for the other languages' names, they don't even need citations. Per all, and those reasons '''are not enough for an unfeaturing'''.
 #{{User|Ultraluigi}} Per MarioSmasher.
-#{{User|Lost Mini Star09}} Per all of the above.
 #{{User|Superluigirules}} Per all. I do not see any reason for sourcing, those sections, and it needs to have not enough information in order to be unfeatured, and this article has enough information.
 #{{User|Mariobros1985}} This article should stay featured, since it is very long and detailed, as well as being interesting to read
@@ Line 29: / Line 26: @@
 #{{User|Koopa K}} 2 reasons? Not even good reasons? Per Vonmack and YoshiPickle!
 #{{User|Pseudo-dino}} Per all.
-#{{User|Annieflower678}} per IceShadow1199
 #{{User|Ultra Koopa}} Gah, will you always get the Featured status off when there's an upcoming game with Goombas?
+#{{User|seanbobe}} keep it keep it i love goombas if u remove it i will never come here again
+#{{User|Goombs}} per every user above
+#{{User|Spenzer66}} Per Mariobros1985.
+#{{User|IceYoshi}} Per IceShadow1199.
+#{{User|JohnRoberts}} I do not see why this should become unfeatured.
+#{{User|Ultramariologan}} Per everyone, and why should it be unfeatured? I mean, at least it has many pictures and lots of information. And when the upcoming games for the 3DS/Wii U games come out, there will be more.
+#{{User|The-Equinox-Arises}} The page has lots of pictures, it's full of info, it should most certainly stay as a Featured article.
+#{{user|Deric1024}}keep it go goomba go goomba GO GOOMBA GO GOOMBA GO GOOMBA GO GOOMBA (etc)(etc)
+#{{user|Megadardery}} Per all.
+#{{user|Mariotime11}} Goombas are main characters and important to the Mario series. I don't see any reason why this article should be unfeatured.
+#{{User|Daisyluva99}} Per Ulramariologan
 ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
@@ Line 41: / Line 48: @@
 I agree with Raven Effect. It would be pointless to cite the Names in Other Languages section. It's also pointless to state the Trivia needs citations. I'll fix MORE typos.{{User|Lost Mini Star09}}
 Yup. Goombas may have to defeat Wario (who I am now obsessing over) in a micro game called "Super Wario Bros." Wario has to. I'll fix those typos, too!{{User|MegaMushroom82}}
+Am I the only one who thinks this has gone on a little too long..? The proposal is going on its 4th month, there's a 20:1 Oppose ratio, this one's pretty much over.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 22:38, 9 August 2012 (EDT)
+:I think nobody has to post here for about a month, though that might be an outdated rule. {{User|GreenDisaster}}
+::Well, if that's the case, it will take forever for this nomination to fail. {{User|Master R.O.B}}
+:Well, Nobody has done this for a while. I'm hoping just to get it over with and keep this page nominated. I really don't think anybody cares anymore. {{User|Mrcrackerpants}}
+:Keep it please! Goombas are the biggest part of the mario universe!-Cwoodman
+:Well, the changes have been made now. So I don't know why it's still going through this. The '''Names in other languages''' section has been fixed, and we really don't have much trivia for it, being a minor character. But when the newer games come out, this will get ''loads'' more information. I don't see why we need to keep this up. JUST MAKE IT FEATURED AGAIN! {{User|Mrcrackerpants}}
+:It was never unfeatured; it was only nominated for unfeaturing with absolutely terrible reasoning. In any case, it's been more than 4 months since this was created and we have way more than a 5:1 ratio, so this should be a failed unfeature.... {{User|Vommack}}