MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/14: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
m (PorpleBot moved page MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 14 to MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/14: Text replacement - "Proposals/Archive " to "Proposals/Archive/")
mNo edit summary
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:


====Keep Merge====
====Keep Merge====


====Comments====
====Comments====
----
----


Line 158: Line 156:


====Support====
====Support====
#{{User|Hyper Guy}} (creator)
#{{User|Hyper Guy}} (creator)


Line 210: Line 207:


====Comments====
====Comments====
----
----


Line 303: Line 299:
We could put ''possible'' pronunciation on unsure ones, and for the actually pronunciation for those we could just put the most common one or the most likley one, or we could always put more then one pronunciation {{User|Dark boo}}
We could put ''possible'' pronunciation on unsure ones, and for the actually pronunciation for those we could just put the most common one or the most likley one, or we could always put more then one pronunciation {{User|Dark boo}}


2257: Yeah, the [[Wikipedia:International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]] is a good way of putting pronunciations (and "informal" spellings such as "Mar-e-o" could be put additionally). I could also help with that. But I don't think we need a proposal for it. Where the pronunciation appears to be interesting, we can put it. (Only problem about IPA is, that some of the symbols don't seem to be displayed correctly - see [[Holerö|this article]] and its [[Talk:Holerö|talk]]). {{User|Time Q}}
2257: Yeah, the [[wikipedia:International Phonetic Alphabet|IPA]] is a good way of putting pronunciations (and "informal" spellings such as "Mar-e-o" could be put additionally). I could also help with that. But I don't think we need a proposal for it. Where the pronunciation appears to be interesting, we can put it. (Only problem about IPA is, that some of the symbols don't seem to be displayed correctly - see [[Holerö|this article]] and its [[Talk:Holerö|talk]]). {{User|Time Q}}


I think that even if this proposal fails, we should be allowed to add pronunciations to articles about subjects whose pronunciations are officially confirmed and not self-explaining. This could be helpful for non-English names as well. I am not voting because I don't think I agree with either option. {{User|Time Q}}
I think that even if this proposal fails, we should be allowed to add pronunciations to articles about subjects whose pronunciations are officially confirmed and not self-explaining. This could be helpful for non-English names as well. I am not voting because I don't think I agree with either option. {{User|Time Q}}
Line 403: Line 399:


====Comments====
====Comments====
Erm... i'm 99% sure that the adventures of super maio bros 3 (which was a cartoon) was released long before Yoshis island, and therefore the babies were seen in the cartoon first. That being said, I don't quite understand this proposal. What is your reasoning behind splitting the pages? If it's just that you think that they were seen in Yoshis island first, than thats not a valid reason. The babies in smb3 are really the same as their yoshis island counterparts. {{User|Luigifreak}}
Erm... i'm 99% sure that the adventures of super maio bros 3 (which was a cartoon) was released long before Yoshis island, and therefore the babies were seen in the cartoon first. That being said, I don't quite understand this proposal. What is your reasoning behind splitting the pages? If it's just that you think that they were seen in Yoshis island first, than thats not a valid reason. The babies in smb3 are really the same as their yoshis island counterparts. {{User|Luigifreak}}


Line 478: Line 473:


====Have absolutely no playable Super Smash Bros. character have the profile style====
====Have absolutely no playable Super Smash Bros. character have the profile style====
#{{user|Cobold}} - having {{tem|SSB Infobox}} is fine, but {{tem|character-infobox}} is useless for all characters who only appear in Smash and not in any other Mario game.
#{{user|Cobold}} - having {{tem|SSB fighter infobox}} is fine, but {{tem|character infobox}} is useless for all characters who only appear in Smash and not in any other Mario game.
#{{user|Yoshario}} - Per Cobold.
#{{user|Yoshario}} - Per Cobold.
#[[User:Super Mario Bros.|SMB]] Oh... never mind. I thought we ''were'' talking about the SSB infobox template. Per Cobold.
#[[User:Super Mario Bros.|SMB]] Oh... never mind. I thought we ''were'' talking about the SSB infobox template. Per Cobold.
Line 491: Line 486:
:Those are only cameo appearances, I don't think they warrant a big box with "affiliations" and "species", as well as "first appearance" and "last appearance", with first and last appearance being games not from the Mario series at all. - {{User|Cobold}}
:Those are only cameo appearances, I don't think they warrant a big box with "affiliations" and "species", as well as "first appearance" and "last appearance", with first and last appearance being games not from the Mario series at all. - {{User|Cobold}}
::I know those are cameos, but it has [[Talk:Mother Brain|been said]] that even characters from the retro microgames would deserve articles or at least lists. [[Mother Brain]] is a "Wario Character" just because she was in a microgame. That doesn't reflect my opinion, I just say how it is at the moment. But at least Link's box should be kept because he had notable roles in the German comics (predating ''Smash Bros.'').--[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:49, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
::I know those are cameos, but it has [[Talk:Mother Brain|been said]] that even characters from the retro microgames would deserve articles or at least lists. [[Mother Brain]] is a "Wario Character" just because she was in a microgame. That doesn't reflect my opinion, I just say how it is at the moment. But at least Link's box should be kept because he had notable roles in the German comics (predating ''Smash Bros.'').--[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:49, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
Having an article is one thing, needing a character-infobox is another thing. If you look at [[Toon Link]], most of the box is filled with non-Mario information. We should only put those infoboxes on pages when there's substantial Marioverse content. I think the poll is a bit too strict with its "all" or "none" options. - {{User|Cobold}} 10:41, 20 June 2009 (EDT)
Having an article is one thing, needing a character infobox is another thing. If you look at [[Toon Link]], most of the box is filled with non-Mario information. We should only put those infoboxes on pages when there's substantial Marioverse content. I think the poll is a bit too strict with its "all" or "none" options. - {{User|Cobold}} 10:41, 20 June 2009 (EDT)


----
----
Line 588: Line 583:
:I've already done it, I just need to consensus to upload the images.{{User|Xestrix}}
:I've already done it, I just need to consensus to upload the images.{{User|Xestrix}}
::I also mean to change <nowiki>[[Image:collagename.jpg]] to [[Image:newimage.jpg]] </nowiki> in every page {{User|Tucayo}}
::I also mean to change <nowiki>[[Image:collagename.jpg]] to [[Image:newimage.jpg]] </nowiki> in every page {{User|Tucayo}}
:::To be technical, Xestrix would have to replace with <nowiki>"[[Image:collagename.PNG]]"</nowiki> with ''both'' <nowiki>"[[Image:newimagePM.png]]" and "[[Image:newimagePM2.png]]"</nowiki>. Fortunately, both images will be able to fit side-by-side in {{tem|Recipe-Infobox}}, and the pages would look the same before and after the split. - {{User|Walkazo}}
:::To be technical, Xestrix would have to replace with <nowiki>"[[Image:collagename.PNG]]"</nowiki> with ''both'' <nowiki>"[[Image:newimagePM.png]]" and "[[Image:newimagePM2.png]]"</nowiki>. Fortunately, both images will be able to fit side-by-side in {{tem|PM recipe infobox}}, and the pages would look the same before and after the split. - {{User|Walkazo}}
::::I understand the work to be done, I wouldn't volunteer for an overwhelming task ^^; {{User|Xestrix}} - Oops, added Sig.
::::I understand the work to be done, I wouldn't volunteer for an overwhelming task ^^; {{User|Xestrix}} - Oops, added Sig.


Line 634: Line 629:


Why not just add a disclosure? "Though Birdo is officially a male character (source:Ninetndo), he is generally referred to as a female in America to avoid confusion amongst younger audiences. For the purpose of this wiki, which is not Japanese, Birdo will be referred to as a female." <-- See, easy? Get the facts out, then set a standard. {{User|Xestrix}}
Why not just add a disclosure? "Though Birdo is officially a male character (source:Ninetndo), he is generally referred to as a female in America to avoid confusion amongst younger audiences. For the purpose of this wiki, which is not Japanese, Birdo will be referred to as a female." <-- See, easy? Get the facts out, then set a standard. {{User|Xestrix}}
:A disclosure is not necessary because there is an entire ''section'' of the Birdo article that deals with her gender (see [[Birdo#Gender|here]]). Birdo is a transsexual ([[Wikipedia:Transgender#Transsexual|transgendered]]) male in the Japanese canon, and this was even carried over to the North American release (and maybe other regions too) of ''[[Super Mario Bros. 2]]'', before being retconned in later games to accommodate the cultures that do not view sexuality as fluidly as the Japanese. As Grandy02 and Super-Yoshi (who was citing a comment I made in the past) pointed out, transsexuals should be identified with the gender they identifies themselves with. While the Japanese may do things differently, as Xestrix reminded us, this is not a Japanese website, and we conduct ourselves according to the English-speaking norms (admittedly, these vary from country to country, but let's just ignore that for the moment, shall we?). Shroobario's example, ''[[Captain Rainbow]]'', actually '''supports''' calling Birdo a female, despite the fact that she is physically male in the game, stating that "depending on one's view point, she is a young lady." One could also argue that once the most recent English-language depiction of Birdo (the current one being ''Captain Rainbow'') includes her as a plain female, we '''have''' to refer to her as a female, like how we call "Princess Toadstool" "[[Princess Peach]]", because that's her name these days. Policy is to refer to her as "Toadstool" only in the sections/articles of games that call her that, but "Peach" everywhere else; this could be applied to Birdo as well, but again, because she's transsexual, even in the games that acknowledge that she is physically male, Birdo should still be referred to using feminine pronouns. Same goes for [[Vivian]], who is also transsexual, and must be dealt with the same way as Birdo (see [[Vivian#Gender|here]] for that article's exposition in regards to Vivian's gender controversy). Also, even if the verdict is to switch (back) to gender neutrality on Birdo's article, '''don't use "it"''' to talk about Birdo, as it's considered offensive and dehumanizing, regardless of a person's sexual identity (Birdo's not ''technically'' human, but you know what I mean). - {{User|Walkazo}}
:A disclosure is not necessary because there is an entire ''section'' of the Birdo article that deals with her gender (see [[Birdo#Gender|here]]). Birdo is a transsexual ([[wikipedia:Transgender#Transsexual|transgendered]]) male in the Japanese canon, and this was even carried over to the North American release (and maybe other regions too) of ''[[Super Mario Bros. 2]]'', before being retconned in later games to accommodate the cultures that do not view sexuality as fluidly as the Japanese. As Grandy02 and Super-Yoshi (who was citing a comment I made in the past) pointed out, transsexuals should be identified with the gender they identifies themselves with. While the Japanese may do things differently, as Xestrix reminded us, this is not a Japanese website, and we conduct ourselves according to the English-speaking norms (admittedly, these vary from country to country, but let's just ignore that for the moment, shall we?). Shroobario's example, ''[[Captain Rainbow]]'', actually '''supports''' calling Birdo a female, despite the fact that she is physically male in the game, stating that "depending on one's view point, she is a young lady." One could also argue that once the most recent English-language depiction of Birdo (the current one being ''Captain Rainbow'') includes her as a plain female, we '''have''' to refer to her as a female, like how we call "Princess Toadstool" "[[Princess Peach]]", because that's her name these days. Policy is to refer to her as "Toadstool" only in the sections/articles of games that call her that, but "Peach" everywhere else; this could be applied to Birdo as well, but again, because she's transsexual, even in the games that acknowledge that she is physically male, Birdo should still be referred to using feminine pronouns. Same goes for [[Vivian]], who is also transsexual, and must be dealt with the same way as Birdo (see [[Vivian#Gender|here]] for that article's exposition in regards to Vivian's gender controversy). Also, even if the verdict is to switch (back) to gender neutrality on Birdo's article, '''don't use "it"''' to talk about Birdo, as it's considered offensive and dehumanizing, regardless of a person's sexual identity (Birdo's not ''technically'' human, but you know what I mean). - {{User|Walkazo}}
::She's not transsexual, she's transgendered--the difference is the former requires sex reassignment surgery, which I doubt exists in the Mushroom World. :P  Minor difference,  but I'm sure Birdo would think it's important. {{User|Goomb-omb}}
::She's not transsexual, she's transgendered--the difference is the former requires sex reassignment surgery, which I doubt exists in the Mushroom World. :P  Minor difference,  but I'm sure Birdo would think it's important. {{User|Goomb-omb}}
:::I use the term "transsexual" because "transgender" (which I'm told is the preferred term over "transgendered" in the trans community) includes such a broad scope of mindsets, whereas Birdo specifically wishes to be accepted as a female and live as a female, which is, to my understanding, the definition of a transsexual. Not all transsexuals wish to have sex reassignment surgery, but we can only speculate on Birdo's position in relation to it, and thus, can't make any deductions based on it. I'm not an expert on transgender/transsexualism, mind you, and all the Internet literature I've read in researching the Birdo (and Vivian) controversy isn't very clear, so I could be way off... - {{User|Walkazo}}
:::I use the term "transsexual" because "transgender" (which I'm told is the preferred term over "transgendered" in the trans community) includes such a broad scope of mindsets, whereas Birdo specifically wishes to be accepted as a female and live as a female, which is, to my understanding, the definition of a transsexual. Not all transsexuals wish to have sex reassignment surgery, but we can only speculate on Birdo's position in relation to it, and thus, can't make any deductions based on it. I'm not an expert on transgender/transsexualism, mind you, and all the Internet literature I've read in researching the Birdo (and Vivian) controversy isn't very clear, so I could be way off... - {{User|Walkazo}}