381,835
edits
Talk:Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions
m
Robot: Automated text replacement (-refneeded +ref needed)
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-refneeded +ref needed)) |
|||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FATALK}} | {{FATALK}} | ||
==Stages== | ==Stages== | ||
Two questions: | Two questions: | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
::::Oh. Well those stages should have their own section in their respective articles (or get their own article). For example, the Peach's Castle section should have a section about SSB in the article, while the [[Mushroom Kingdom (stage)|Mushroom Kingdom stage]] should have its own article, as the real Mushroom Kingdom is a political entity, not a level. This SSB page should probably just have links to those stage pages, instead of descriptions. The descriptions should be in the articles themselves. Images should then go in the stage articles. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ::::Oh. Well those stages should have their own section in their respective articles (or get their own article). For example, the Peach's Castle section should have a section about SSB in the article, while the [[Mushroom Kingdom (stage)|Mushroom Kingdom stage]] should have its own article, as the real Mushroom Kingdom is a political entity, not a level. This SSB page should probably just have links to those stage pages, instead of descriptions. The descriptions should be in the articles themselves. Images should then go in the stage articles. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||
== Meant-to-be-in == | == Meant-to-be-in == | ||
Can someone give a source for all those characters who were meant to be in but left out? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:59, 12 November 2007 (EST) | Can someone give a source for all those characters who were meant to be in but left out? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:59, 12 November 2007 (EST) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
I did here that Meowth actually was supposed to be in it. So was Mewtwo. Both removed. [[User:MegaMario9910|MegaMario9910]] | I did here that Meowth actually was supposed to be in it. So was Mewtwo. Both removed. [[User:MegaMario9910|MegaMario9910]] | ||
:What's the source for the meant-to-be-in characters and the reasons for the cuts, actually? Don't cite Wikipedia, there everyone can edit, too. | :What's the source for the meant-to-be-in characters and the reasons for the cuts, actually? Don't cite Wikipedia, there everyone can edit, too. Beta Elements cites SmashWiki, but that's another Wiki as well. There's no source mentioned for the early voice cast, either. So, any reliable sources? By the way, Master Hand's artwork isn't from ''Super Smash Bros.'' --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:02, 9 December 2008 (EST) | ||
I have added "citation needed" to several things since nobody answered. Better get reliable sources (NO wikis) or remove the info if it is false, because an article with such tags doesn't have to be featured. Also, can I remove the ''Kirby & The Amazing Mirror'' Master Hand artwork now? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:14, 9 June 2009 (EDT) | I have added "citation needed" to several things since nobody answered. Better get reliable sources (NO wikis) or remove the info if it is false, because an article with such tags doesn't have to be featured. Also, can I remove the ''Kirby & The Amazing Mirror'' Master Hand artwork now? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:14, 9 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
== List of characters == | == List of characters == | ||
Is a complete list of the cameo characters really necessary, especially on the top of the article? We have [[List of Cameos]] for that. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:02, 21 June 2009 (EDT) | Is a complete list of the cameo characters really necessary, especially on the top of the article? We have [[List of Cameos]] for that. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:02, 21 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Such a list has been added to several articles ([[Game & Watch Gallery 4|example]]). Agree with Cobold, espcially because such in-depth information shouldn't be on the top and also because it's redundant in this case. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:31, 26 June 2009 (EDT) | :Such a list has been added to several articles ([[Game & Watch Gallery 4|example]]). Agree with Cobold, espcially because such in-depth information shouldn't be on the top and also because it's redundant in this case. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:31, 26 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
::It really doesn't make sense for the cameos in one game to be listed on two separate articles. Agree with Cobold on this one. {{User:Glitchman/sig}} 12:35, 21 July 2009 (EDT) | ::It really doesn't make sense for the cameos in one game to be listed on two separate articles. Agree with Cobold on this one. {{User:Glitchman/sig}} 12:35, 21 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::So, can the "Characters Appearing in This Game" list just be removed? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 16:15, 25 March 2010 (EDT) | |||
::::We shouldn't get rid of the whole section, but the "Cameos and Allusions" section, I scrapped, since you can't cameo in your own series. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | |||
:::::I think it should go now, because every character in the list is already in another list in the article. It's simply redundant. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:02, 28 April 2010 (EDT) | |||
== Delete this article? == | == Delete this article? == | ||
| Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
how is this a kirby game? {{user|gamer2.1}} | how is this a kirby game? {{user|gamer2.1}} | ||
:: It's not, obviously. If it's based off any game, it's [[Super Mario Bros.]] [[User:Purplebackpack89|Purplebackpack89]] 00:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
==extra info== | ==extra info== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 44: | ||
Also that goes for the fighting polygon team too. {{user:gamer2.1/sig}} | Also that goes for the fighting polygon team too. {{user:gamer2.1/sig}} | ||
== Screenshots, please. == | |||
We need more screenshots for this article. [[User:Krizzy|Krizzy]] 06:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Bad Grammar == | |||
I noticed that the page has had some horrible grammar for a long time. May I edit it?--[[User:MarioMaster2011|MarioMaster2011]] 19:23, 7 July 2011 (EDT)MarioMaster2011 | |||
Of course there's no rule stating you can't. Just edit it property. | |||
{{User:Lindsay151/sig}} | |||
==Pit?== | |||
Was it true that [[Pit]] was meant to be one of the unlockable characters on SSB, however due to the popularity of [[Pokémon]], [[Jigglypuff]] replaced him as a unlockable character at the end? '''[[User:McAusten]]!''' '''·''' [[User talk:McAusten|talk to me]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/McAusten|my edits]] 18:07, 13 December 2011 (EST) | |||
:No. {{User:Nintendo64Fan/sig}} | |||
== Controls == | |||
There are no controls in the article, but I don't know the N64 controller graphics.--[[User:NSMM|NSMM]] ([[User talk:NSMM|talk]]) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (EST) | |||
== Incorrect Australian release date? == | |||
Basically, this section was started due to [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros.&curid=7935&diff=2393780&oldid=2388904 an attempt on Bulbapedia to have an Australian release date for Super Smash Bros.] After some searching on SmashWiki failed, I came across the date on this article for December 17th, 1999. However, with no reference on the article, I attempted to take the date and try to find a source that would collaborate it through a search engine. When that failed, I ended up checking the history and found [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros.&diff=next&oldid=1636418 that an IP address with only three other edits had added the date with no source.] I was wondering if anyone could collaborate this specific date or if this date might possibly false or currently unconfirmable data. --[[User:Super Goku V|Super Goku V]] ([[User talk:Super Goku V|talk]]) 23:34, 4 February 2016 (EST) | |||
:Considering that there has been no response and that the only evidence I can find is that it came out after August 1999, can the date be hidden until something can collaborate this date? --[[User:Super Goku V|Super Goku V]] ([[User talk:Super Goku V|talk]]) 22:28, 9 February 2016 (EST) | |||
::I think I was about to respond, but I don't have any sources that can neither confirm nor deny it. If there isn't a source, you have to stick {{tem|ref needed}} just to let readers know that the information is dubious. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 22:40, 9 February 2016 (EST) | |||
:::Ah, thank you for responding. Based on what I can find, it definitely came out after August 4th of 1999, but dates after that get blurry quick. Currently, I would presume that the best way to confirm a date might be to find an Australian magazine that covered the game before it came out, but finding something that would help has not been going well. --[[User:Super Goku V|Super Goku V]] ([[User talk:Super Goku V|talk]]) 23:11, 10 February 2016 (EST) | |||