Talk:List of Adventure Mode enemies: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} Per proposal.
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} Per proposal.
#{{User|King Pikante}} Consistency is best. Per proposal.
#{{User|King Pikante}} Consistency is best. Per proposal.
#{{User|BowserJunior}} Per all.


===Do Not Split===
===Do Not Split===


===Comments===
===Comments===

Revision as of 17:20, April 18, 2013

Article's content

In it's current form, the article offers nothing more than Trophy Descriptions (SSBM). It should have original descriptions, like Subspace Army. Couldn't the descriptions from former separate articles be used as a base? The article has a construction template, but it hasn't changed since months. --Grandy02 15:10, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Honestly we should just give every enemy a separate article (merge the Mario ones) with a template linking these nine or so enemies. Having five SSB enemy articles is not a big deal, seeing as we have probably well over a thousand Mario enemy articles, many which could have even less content. -- Son of Suns (talk)
If I remember right, there was proposal for merging the Mario-unrelated Adventure Mode enemies (that's why this article was created). Separate articles would conflict with it. What to do? --Grandy02 18:16, 6 December 2008 (EST)
Proposal time! -- Son of Suns (talk)

Create separate articles for the Adventure Mode enemies

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, May 19, 2024, 05:39 GMT

With the proposal to split all the Subspace Army enemies in full swing, why should the enemies from Adventure Mode be overlooked? Like others have said, it would be inconsistent to have articles for Alloys, Fighting Polygons, and Fighting Wire Frames, but not for the other enemies. If the other proposal I mentioned also passes, then it would be even more consistent to leave the enemies here merged. Also, this proposal will not result in stubs. Short articles, perhaps, but stubs are articles that are lacking in information, not articles that are small.

Proposer: GreenDisaster (talk)
Deadline: May 2, 2013, 23:59 GMT.

Split

  1. GreenDisaster (talk) Per proposal.
  2. King Pikante (talk) Consistency is best. Per proposal.
  3. BowserJunior (talk) Per all.

Do Not Split

Comments