Talk:Giant Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
(→Merge) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Merge Giant Donkey Kong to [[Donkey Kong]]== | ==Merge Giant Donkey Kong to [[Donkey Kong]]== | ||
{{ | {{settledTPP}} | ||
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | ||
{{scrollbox| | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT) | '''Deadline''': 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT) | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:Why are you giving me an attitude? I really do not appreciate how you say to me "your picking and choosing when to follow your own rules". Instead of trying to infuriate me, why can't we be reasonable and logical? {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} | :Why are you giving me an attitude? I really do not appreciate how you say to me "your picking and choosing when to follow your own rules". Instead of trying to infuriate me, why can't we be reasonable and logical? {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} | ||
im sorry it's just i get confused because people on this wiki are constantly using different logic on proposals than using the total opposite of that in a different proposal that has the same sort of flow {{User|Iggykoopa}} | im sorry it's just i get confused because people on this wiki are constantly using different logic on proposals than using the total opposite of that in a different proposal that has the same sort of flow {{User|Iggykoopa}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 13:09, April 3, 2011
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 
22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. Template:Scrollbox
