Talk:Giant Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
m (→Merge) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Consistency is one of my priorities when making decisions. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Consistency is one of my priorities when making decisions. | ||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per proposal. | #{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|Pokémon Trainer Mario}} Per BLOF! | |||
===Keep Split=== | ===Keep Split=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Revision as of 08:00, March 20, 2011
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 
22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, May 21, 2024, 14:13 GMT
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles.
Proposer: BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Deadline: 2 April 2011 23:59 (GMT)
Merge
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Consistency is one of my priorities when making decisions.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per proposal.
- Pokémon Trainer Mario (talk) Per BLOF!
