Category talk:Chess Pieces: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Delete) |
(→Delete) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per proposal. | #{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per proposal. | ||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Thirteen isn't ''horrible'' as far as size goes (originally, there were categories for every type of chess piece: now ''that'' was excessive), but when you look at the articles, it's the ugly ducking of the categories: it would be better to just not have it around. | #{{User|Walkazo}} - Thirteen isn't ''horrible'' as far as size goes (originally, there were categories for every type of chess piece: now ''that'' was excessive), but when you look at the articles, it's the ugly ducking of the categories: it would be better to just not have it around. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} This category may as well be called "important characters in the Mario series". Per all | |||
===Keep=== | ===Keep=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Revision as of 07:44, July 27, 2012
Is this category really necessary? GreenDisaster 14:55, 30 March 2012 (EDT)
- I agree, I think it should be deleted.
Tails777 Talk to me!
Delete Category:Chess Pieces
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, May 21, 2024, 15:37 GMT
This category seems pointless in my opinion. One, it's a small category, composed of only 13 articles. Two, it's a category comprising the characters that appear as pieces for a chess game that most of the articles give a single line to, if they even mention it. It seems too insignificant to have a category for it. Three, how many people actually use this category? It just doesn't seem that useful.
Proposer: GreenDisaster (talk)
Deadline: August 6, 2012, 23:59 GMT
Delete
- GreenDisaster (talk) Per proposal.
- LightningBlue (talk) Not enough pages and this is a single game.
- Super-Yoshi (talk) Really minuscle category, don't need it.
- Lindsay151 (talk) Per all.
- Tails777 (talk) Per what I said above.
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per proposal.
- Walkazo (talk) - Thirteen isn't horrible as far as size goes (originally, there were categories for every type of chess piece: now that was excessive), but when you look at the articles, it's the ugly ducking of the categories: it would be better to just not have it around.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) This category may as well be called "important characters in the Mario series". Per all
