Talk:List of controversies

Inappropriate fan art

There is a issue. It really bothers me. So ya know fan-art right? Well, due to the female chararcters (Super Mario Strikers I suppose) having certain appearances, there is inappropriate fan-art. Get my boat? Kirby kart (talk)

Rule 34 of the Internet: if it exists, there's inappropriate fan-art of it (and fanfiction, and everything else under the sun). It's not a Mario series specific thing, so there's no point going over it here. - Walkazo 22:03, 7 October 2014 (EDT)

Wikipedia: Rule 34 (Internet meme). This is not a controversy, and definately not a Mario one. Just visit some fan art site and see for your self. Sudowoodo(talk) 14:21, 8 October 2014 (EDT)

Dr. Mario?

Doing some research on Dr. Mario. Retrieved from Wikipedia: according to the Video Game Bible, there is a section that mentions that "Parental groups were upset with Nintendo at their choice of content, since many parents disagreed with the use of medicine in the game.", and it's apparently notable enough that Craig Harris of IGN mocked it. Can anyone find any more details regarding this, because it sounds like something noteworthy to be in this page? It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:34, 12 October 2014 (EDT)

Order the subsections of the "Lawsuits" section

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Sunday, May 26, 2024, 13:34 GMT

Even though there's a Lawsuits section, the subsections are randomly ordered, which makes no sense to me. I propose that we reorder them for better organization purposes.

Proposer: Stonehill (talk)
Deadline: April 15, 2015, at 23:59 GMT.

Chronological

1. Stonehill (talk) I would go with this one, as Alphabetical doesn't seem to make sense.
2. SuperYoshiBros (talk) Per Stonehill.
3. Andymii (talk) Per proposal.
4. Walkazo (talk) - Chronological paints a clearer picture of Mario through the years and could handle any situations where lawsuits build off each other. Plus, alphabetical order is dependent on the phrasing of the headers, which is up to the discretion of the editors.
5. Binarystep (talk) Chronological makes a lot more sense for a list of events.
6. Burningdragon25 (talk) The list will be nice when we put it in chronological order and with that, I'll go with everyone!
7. Ghost Jam (talk) Per all, but I think the entire article could stand a clean up as well.

Comments

To be honest, the entire page could stand a standard rewrite. -- Ghost Jam 13:47, 1 April 2015 (EDT)

This shouldn't even need a proposal, but either organization can work, honestly. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:53, 1 April 2015 (EDT)