MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Princess Daisy

Princess Daisy

Remove Featured Article Status

1. Time Turner (talk) About a year ago, I made a nomination to unfeature Daisy's article. Since then, the article has had a lot of work put into it and has been refeatured. I commend everyone who pitched in to improve it, and the article does look better than I last saw it, but some of the flaws I brought up in the denomination haven't been settled, such as the sections that still lack images, or the "relationships" section that's still awkwardly written and grasping at straws. There are also a couple of areas that seem to be flawed: several of the sections covering games are rather short, and, though I understand that nothing more can really be said about them, they could be organized in a similar fashion to how the Mario Party series is organized; Music brings up several points of interest, such as how the song lyrics had flaws or that Save Me (With Your Charm) was sung by Daisy, but does not elaborate at all on these points, and would benefit greatly from some expansion; Special abilities goes into far more detail than is necessary for the section, and lists a lot of general aspects about Daisy rather than her genuine special abilities; Appearance and Clothing border on being straight from a novel ("sapphire-blue eyes and orange-ginger hair"?), and definitely needs to be rewritten. At this point, I've already outlined numerous problems with the article, problems that, in my opinion, need to be corrected for this article to be considered worthy of keeping its status as a featured article.
2. Baby Luigi (talk) I've always wondered why the hell her clothing and sports wear section isn't merged with the appearance (and renamed to physical description), like any other normal character article. Per Time Turner, by the way.
3. Ashley and Red (talk) I refeatured it last time. I agrre with you. I will try to fix the clothing/abilities sections.
4. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Per Time Turner

Comments

I will try to fix clothing/abilities section( as I said above). I think that the "Relationships" sectoon looks good, but I will try to rewrite some things there. And @TimeTurner, I didn't understood her "songs" part of your support Ashley and Red (talk)

What... the... hell... ANOTHER UNFA NOMINATION? You guys want to unfeature every article on this wiki? (quote from past archive) Epic Rosalina (talk)

Yes if they don't comply with the rules. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)

If they don't meet FA standards as they currently are, then an unfeature nomination isn't all that unreasonable. I don't see a problem with it, as it ultimately results in constructive work, though I'm sure most people would prefer they were up to standard BEFORE they get considered for unfeaturing (I know I do). Lord Grammaticus (talk)

If that's what you think, I think this wiki has a lot of dumb rules here. Epic Rosalina (talk)

It's not dumb rule if the article legitimately has problems. Do you want a problem-infested article featured on this wiki? Baby Luigi (talk)

I don't give a crap about the quality of the article, I just care about that pretty star in the top corner! Epic Rosalina (talk)