MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dimentio

Dimentio

Remove Featured Article Status

1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) If the tense template is up for a while and no one has made any changes, then why are we hesitating to unfeature it? Besides, the article seems to be long on the text and a little bit short on the images. There are grammar errors and informal style here and there, but my main concern is the tense template and how the article is written.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. Kaptain K. Rool (talk): Dimentio possibly has a lot of info. O_o.
2. SolarBlaze (talk): As I said earlier, I went ahead and corrected the article's errors, so I'm going to go ahead and place my vote on keeping its Featured Article status.

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Kaptain K. Rool

1. LeftyGreenMario (talk)Dimentio has a boatload of info, but the article is lacking in images and there is a tense template. You need to give a valid reason.
2. Edofenrir (talk) - Have to agree here. Info quantity is not everything. Also, the info won't mysteriously disappear with the FA status.
3. Reversinator (talk) Per.
4. Bowser's luma (talk) Per as well.

Comments

In my opinion, you can always change the tense yourself quite easily (though it is quite a pain). I understand changing the informal parts are a pain, though. Images should be the main concern, though. I don't have the game to do this, though. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I'll see what I can do about fixing this article's problems. SolarBlaze (talk)

The template is still there :/ And did you read my other reasons? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

The present/past-tense errors have been corrected. SolarBlaze (talk)