Talk:Giant Kirby: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per Pokemon Trainer Mario. They are '''not''' the same person!
#{{User|Reversinator}} Per Pokemon Trainer Mario. They are '''not''' the same person!
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per Pokemon Trainer Mario.
#{{User|Nicke8}} Per Pokemon Trainer Mario.
#{{User|Brianne the Frank}} Giant Kirby isn't exactly a Kirby. He's more like a subspecies. You know, like how Greater Pandas are not the same as Lesser Pandas? Kind of like that.


===Comments===
===Comments===

Revision as of 20:38, March 9, 2011

Are pages like this actually needed? What's the big difference between Giant Kirby and a giant Kirby? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

I guess we should merge it. Just write down on Kirby's page: "after beating all of the Kirby's, a Giant Kirby will appear to battle the player". So, yeah, merge it. My Bloody Valentine

Merge Giant Kirby to Kirby

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Tuesday, June 11, 2024, 16:01 GMT

I don't really see the point of separate articles like these when this character is simply a bigger version of Kirby with no distinct abilities other than size. We can mention a giant Kirby gets battled as a boss in Super Smash Bros. Melee in the Kirby article and things will still be fine.

If this proposal goes well, I'll suggest merging other characters that will warrant this, namely Giant Donkey Kong and Giant Bowser. We should also do this for consistent sake, since Giant Baby Bowser is a redirect, unlike the other giant characters.

Merge it

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
  2. Zero777 (talk) I am Zero! Per BLOF and per my reasoning in the Ridley, Meta Ridley proposal, leave it to the WiKirby or Smash Wiki. Zero signing out.
  3. DKC2 King Liam (talk) I think it will be good. It is basically just Kirby in a giant form.
  4. Yoshidude99 (talk) It's just Kirby but bigger.
  5. Bop1996 (talk) Per Zero.
  6. Tails777 (talk) Per all.
  7. Bowser's luma (talk) I now will call this factor the Ridley Rule. Per all.
  8. Ultrahammer5365 (talk) Per all.
  9. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I can easily hack Mario to be huge, but how come he still does not deserve an article called "Giant Mario"? We might need an article on Giant Mario for the event match. No. There is no point. Merge.
  10. Walkazo (talk) - Per all. I'll also support merging Giant DK and Giant Bowser (the latter definitely can't be called a separate entity like the other two, not with all those non-SSB appearances covered on the page).
  11. DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk) No point have separate articles. Giant Kirby is just a larger Kirby.

Leave it

  1. SWFlash (talk) Then you should merge Giant Donkey Kong and many others to subject articles.
  2. Pokémon Trainer Mario (talk) Giant Kirby is not a big version of Kirby. Why would someone merge them?
  3. Reversinator (talk) Per Pokemon Trainer Mario. They are not the same person!
  4. Nicke8 (talk) Per Pokemon Trainer Mario.
  5. Brianne the Frank (talk) Giant Kirby isn't exactly a Kirby. He's more like a subspecies. You know, like how Greater Pandas are not the same as Lesser Pandas? Kind of like that.

Comments

SWFlash: Did you even read my proposal statement? BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C)

Am I getting too talkative? I'm perfectly open to 'please stop's and 'you're getting on my nerves's, if anyone is getting annoyed. Anyway, in response to Leftygreenmario... that might be because Giant Mario wouldn't be an official character.