MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Krunch: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Remove featured article status: I voted) |
(Agreed, this article shouldn’t have been featured) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated= 19:12, October 2, 2022 (EDT) | |nominated= 19:12, October 2, 2022 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=12:11, October 8, 2022 (EST) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Ray Trace}} I have never supported nomination for this article (this was nominated in a time period where I was inactive so I couldn't give any input) and I also agree that it's not remarkable. | #{{User|Ray Trace}} I have never supported nomination for this article (this was nominated in a time period where I was inactive so I couldn't give any input) and I also agree that it's not remarkable. | ||
#{{User|RHG1951}} Per all. | #{{User|RHG1951}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per the first three; this article is stunningly not standout enough for something that ever got that many feature votes. The only marked-level good aspect of it is the image quantity. | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:12, October 8, 2022
Krunch
Remove featured article status
- Wikiboy10 (talk) The nomination of Krunch's article happened on August 30, 2020, and passed without opposition. Looking back, though, I feel there is just one problem the article has: the length. One user does try to justify this, stating that it isn't about the size of the article, and I get that. It's by far the best-written essay I've seen for a somewhat forgotten character, and it's not favoritism either. I think any subject, whether it be a loved character, a hated character, or a character people forget about, has the potential to be featured. However, the featured article rules state that length is crucial. I'll quote this: "In this case, although these articles are complete and are written to the best of the editor's abilities, they are too short to be categorized among the best articles in MarioWiki and therefore, are not rich enough in content to be considered featured articles." While everything is well-written (though I think the section regarding DKCR is a bit flowery and overdrawn), the piece isn't "rich" enough to be remarkable. Therefore, I am nominating this article to be unfeatured.
- Pulsebot (talk) Per Wikiboy10. This page, while being really good-written and formally perfect, is... just not too remarkable to be featured (compared to others like Vivian, King Olly or Dixie Kong (for being fair)). Additionally, I'd like to mention the Kiddy Kong page that falls exactly under the category (better than average articles, but doesn't qualify to be featured).
- Ray Trace (talk) I have never supported nomination for this article (this was nominated in a time period where I was inactive so I couldn't give any input) and I also agree that it's not remarkable.
- RHG1951 (talk) Per all.
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per the first three; this article is stunningly not standout enough for something that ever got that many feature votes. The only marked-level good aspect of it is the image quantity.
