MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
====Oppose (Keep Trivia)==== | ====Oppose (Keep Trivia)==== | ||
#[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]] Trivia sections exist for information that can't be placed WELL somewhere in another section of the article. Although some people overdo it, they still come of good use when there is such information. | #[[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]] Trivia sections exist for information that can't be placed WELL somewhere in another section of the article. Although some people overdo it, they still come of good use when there is such information. | ||
#{{User:3dejong/sig|per above, plus the fact that there's no place else to PUT trivia.}} | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
It's not a good idea to merge such a thing into the cameos section when it would only be one sentence. When you qualify a separate paragraph as one sentence, or even two the page looks like someone's trying too hard. Like I said, sometimes there actually can be a lot of information that shouldn't be crammed somewhere in the article. I would be very disappointed to see such an option to leave my grasp, especially for smaller pages. Come on, people. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]] | It's not a good idea to merge such a thing into the cameos section when it would only be one sentence. When you qualify a separate paragraph as one sentence, or even two the page looks like someone's trying too hard. Like I said, sometimes there actually can be a lot of information that shouldn't be crammed somewhere in the article. I would be very disappointed to see such an option to leave my grasp, especially for smaller pages. Come on, people. [[User:Fixitup|Fixitup]] | ||
:Do you have any examples for us? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:49, 14 April 2008 (EDT) | :Do you have any examples for us? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 23:49, 14 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Where would the interesting facts go? What'd we do with the displaced trivia? {{User:3dejong/sig|III'MMM ACTING AS IF}} | |||
==Splits & Merges== | ==Splits & Merges== |
Revision as of 23:56, April 14, 2008
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. Also,
New FeaturesNormal Smash MovesetsI have read the Player's Guide to Super Smash Bros Melee, and realized that every character's moves have a different name. I propose to add a list of their move names on each character's page. It would help complete the articles, plus I remember some advice on the talk page of Son of Suns:"If there is any information ina a manual that is not on the wiki, upload it". Guides help you just as much as manuals do, so that's why we should do this. Anyone with me?DarkMario Hamtaro PWNS| Proposer:DarkMario Hamtaro PWNS| Add
Do Not AddCommentsWhat exactly do you mean by "Normal Smash Movesets"? My Bloody Valentine RemovalsTrivia SectionsWhile I'm well aware we are not Wikipedia, I feel that trivia sections detract greatly from the quality of an article. Pieces of information pertaining to topics adressed previously are placed in an unsorted list at the end of the article. Now, I know that we already are against, "overly long" trivia sections, and that's a good thing, but if we allow trivia sections to exist, they'll grow into "overly long" sections. In other words, we can either stop them before they happen, or we can wait until a dedicated user comes along and puts the factoids where they belong in the article. Proposer: Stumpers! Support (Remove Trivia)
Oppose (Keep Trivia)
CommentsOf course, there's the issue about things such as the "Nintendo Monopoly" characters. Where do you merge them? Into a cameo appearances section. Stumpers! 23:12, 14 April 2008 (EDT) It's not a good idea to merge such a thing into the cameos section when it would only be one sentence. When you qualify a separate paragraph as one sentence, or even two the page looks like someone's trying too hard. Like I said, sometimes there actually can be a lot of information that shouldn't be crammed somewhere in the article. I would be very disappointed to see such an option to leave my grasp, especially for smaller pages. Come on, people. Fixitup Where would the interesting facts go? What'd we do with the displaced trivia? 3D, III'MMM ACTING AS IF Splits & MergesMario Kart DS KartsSo I've been reading through the after-mentioned articles, and I've noticed that they all read something like "The [insert name here] is [insert character here]'s [availability] kart in Mario Kart DS. [Describes appearance here]. [Describes stats here]." So I propose that we merge these into character aticles such as "Mario's Karts in Mario Kart DS" or something shorter to that effect. Opinions? Proposer: huntercrunch Merge Kart articles
Keep articles seperate
CommentsSuper Mario Advance seriesIt has recently come to my attention that there is a page for the original Super Mario Advance, but not for Super Mario Advance 4, which is just included as a remake of SMB3 on that game's page. There is also a separate page for the Super Mario Advance series, which includes information and the cover art of all four games. Having to try to find information about these games on different pages is a hassle, so I propose we delete the Super Mario Advance article and simply expand the page that has to do with the series itself. Proposer: Glitchman (talk · contribs) Merge articles to one page
Keep the articles the sameCommentsChangesNone at the moment. MiscellaneousNone at the moment. |