User talk:Hiccup: Difference between revisions
(→Hi) |
m (Headed the conversations, added correct indentations and replied to the conversations) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:Hatena Kid/Welcome}} | {{User:Hatena Kid/Welcome}} | ||
== | ==Comment on [[Manky Kong]] Article== | ||
I wouldn't add speculation into articles, it's unprofessional and you could end up with a warning if this kind of behavior continues. {{User:Epic Rosalina/sig}} 14:44, 25 February 2014 (EST) | I wouldn't add speculation into articles, it's unprofessional and you could end up with a warning if this kind of behavior continues. {{User:Epic Rosalina/sig}} 14:44, 25 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:What specific speculation are you referring to? --[[User:Hiccup|Hiccup]] ([[User talk:Hiccup|talk]]) 14:48, 25 February 2014 (EST) | :What specific speculation are you referring to? --[[User:Hiccup|Hiccup]] ([[User talk:Hiccup|talk]]) 14:48, 25 February 2014 (EST) | ||
Please don't do stuff like this: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Manky_Kong&curid=16503&diff=1633206&oldid=1615607 | ::Please don't do stuff like this: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Manky_Kong&curid=16503&diff=1633206&oldid=1615607. It's rather offensive to some people. {{User:Epic Rosalina/sig}} 16:16, 25 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:::I definitely support correcting the sort of inane shit statement like the one linked to above, but "repair, don't respond" is definitely a principle that applies to the wiki. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (EST) | |||
::::Yes, I was poking fun at the sentence which I thought was thoughtless. I agree I should have just corrected it properly rather than having the article "comment on itself". --[[User:Hiccup|Hiccup]] ([[User talk:Hiccup|talk]]) 11:49, 26 February 2014 (EST) | |||
I definitely support correcting the sort of inane shit statement like the one linked to above, but "repair, don't respond" is definitely a principle that applies to the wiki. | |||
=="Beta" pages== | |||
Speaking of which, you're looking to improve the beta pages? Cool! I went on an one man(child) crusade a bit over a year ago to organise the pages into the "Early ideas/builds/Unused content/misc" structure that's used now, but I haven't had as much time as I'd like to to throughously rewrite and source non-ridiculous claims. Do you feel the beta ___ namespace has any particularly galling issues beside writing and sourcing? --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (EST) | Speaking of which, you're looking to improve the beta pages? Cool! I went on an one man(child) crusade a bit over a year ago to organise the pages into the "Early ideas/builds/Unused content/misc" structure that's used now, but I haven't had as much time as I'd like to to throughously rewrite and source non-ridiculous claims. Do you feel the beta ___ namespace has any particularly galling issues beside writing and sourcing? --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:I think the name "beta" is ridiculous, since betas rarely have cut content. I'm currently making a prerelease article for [http://www.TCRF.net TCRF.net] (The Cutting Room Floor: a wiki about unused, debug, prerelease (cut) content and version differences (including prototypes). But I am perfectly happy to contribute here as well in some way. If you want some idea of how I think "beta" articles should be done, you might want to look at TCRFs (in my opinion, great) guidelines ([http://tcrf.net/Help:Contents/Rules_%26_Guidelines here] and [http://tcrf.net/Help:Contents/Prerelease_Rules_%26_Guidelines here]). You may also want to look at some [http://tcrf.net/Category:Super_Mario_Bros._series articles]. --[[User:Hiccup|Hiccup]] ([[User talk:Hiccup|talk]]) 11:49, 26 February 2014 (EST) |
Revision as of 12:49, February 26, 2014
Welcome to the Super Mario Wiki! Welcome to the Super Mario Wiki!, a sweet community knowledge-base just for the Marioverse. We're glad to have you as a member. If you have any questions, just post it on the FAQ talk page or ask an experienced member and/or Sysop. Here's a handy list of articles that contain guidance and information about reading, authoring, and participating in the Super Mario Wiki community. If this is your first time visiting, please read our Introduction. How do I do that?
Specific Help
Categories You can also check out the following categories: External Resources Things you can do
Hope this is helpful to you. You can delete it when you are done reading it, or you can keep it. If you have any questions this might not have covered, feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. If you need any help creating a custom signature, I can help you with that, too! Signed- You're watching Disney Channel! |
Comment on Manky Kong Article
I wouldn't add speculation into articles, it's unprofessional and you could end up with a warning if this kind of behavior continues. Epic Rosalina 14:44, 25 February 2014 (EST)
- Please don't do stuff like this: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Manky_Kong&curid=16503&diff=1633206&oldid=1615607. It's rather offensive to some people. Epic Rosalina 16:16, 25 February 2014 (EST)
"Beta" pages
Speaking of which, you're looking to improve the beta pages? Cool! I went on an one man(child) crusade a bit over a year ago to organise the pages into the "Early ideas/builds/Unused content/misc" structure that's used now, but I haven't had as much time as I'd like to to throughously rewrite and source non-ridiculous claims. Do you feel the beta ___ namespace has any particularly galling issues beside writing and sourcing? --Glowsquid (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2014 (EST)
- I think the name "beta" is ridiculous, since betas rarely have cut content. I'm currently making a prerelease article for TCRF.net (The Cutting Room Floor: a wiki about unused, debug, prerelease (cut) content and version differences (including prototypes). But I am perfectly happy to contribute here as well in some way. If you want some idea of how I think "beta" articles should be done, you might want to look at TCRFs (in my opinion, great) guidelines (here and here). You may also want to look at some articles. --Hiccup (talk) 11:49, 26 February 2014 (EST)