MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story

Remove Featured Article Status

1. GreenDisaster (talk) This article has the same problems as its prequel, Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved rewrite-expand template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article.
2. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GD.
3. Yoshi876 (talk) Per all.
4. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per GreenDisaster. I also want to mention that the sprites in the enemies section are not in a consistent .png format, with some being .gifs. Plus, some of them are even animated. We should keep all sprites in a static .png format.
5. Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Per all
6. King Pikante (talk) Per all.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - This page has undergone SO much work to just get it featured, and I'm not going to stand and let all that sacrificed time to make this all reversed. Though your points are very clear, they are very minor and easily fixable. I mean, I don't know who even made some images gifs. The story just need a few touch-ups, and it really isn't that bad. This is actually one of the better Feature Articles, and even with the errors it still fits the Feature Article quota.

Comments

There are empty sections in the article as well, but that's just a minor, easily fixed problem. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Again, Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga also suffers from a bloated summary, lack of key information, and plus, it also features an incredibly sloppy-looking sidequest section. AND, a pretty short intro paragraph. But, that's another unfeature nomination. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I have one more nomination before I hit the limit. Might as well unfeature that one as well. GreenDisaster (talk)

OT: Why do we even have a limit in the first place? I remember when there was that proposal for it... but nobody's really spamming FA nominations nowadays. Besides, the Featured Article nomination process has considerably slowed down. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Just because nobodies spamming fa nominations now doesn't mean they wont in the future I'd rather have the rule in effect to stop it before it happens. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)