Talk:Blooper Baby: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Baby Template: fixing sig) |
(→5: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Should this go on the Baby Template? {{User|Mario freak}} | Should this go on the Baby Template? {{User|Mario freak}} | ||
:No, the Baby template is for individual Baby charatcers, not a "species" of babies. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:39, 30 June 2009 (EDT) | :No, the Baby template is for individual Baby charatcers, not a "species" of babies. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:39, 30 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
== 5 == | |||
Someone needs to learn how to count, because that 2D artwork has 4 Baby Bloopers. | |||
Revision as of 22:23, December 10, 2012
Are these enemies called Baby Bloopers or Blooper Babies? The Paper Mario tattle seems to support the later. -- Son of Suns
Species
Shouldn't the species be blooper not baby? - Myles 23:20, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
Baby Template
Should this go on the Baby Template? Mario freak (talk)
- No, the Baby template is for individual Baby charatcers, not a "species" of babies. - Walkazo 20:39, 30 June 2009 (EDT)
5
Someone needs to learn how to count, because that 2D artwork has 4 Baby Bloopers.
