388
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
→Comments
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
:Well IMO Super Famicom 64 is invalid he sites the misinformed opinion that this will make loads of stubs which doesn't make any sense that level articles can be very well written but every other vote is invalid {{User|Raven Effect}} | :Well IMO Super Famicom 64 is invalid he sites the misinformed opinion that this will make loads of stubs which doesn't make any sense that level articles can be very well written but every other vote is invalid {{User|Raven Effect}} | ||
::I didn't mean every level article being marked instantly as new stub. Now, "Proposal passes = '''possible''' load of new stubs." {{User|Super Famicom 64}} | ::I didn't mean every level article being marked instantly as new stub. Now, "Proposal passes = '''possible''' load of new stubs." {{User|Super Famicom 64}} | ||
:::If people follow the guidelines, there will be no new stubs. [[User:Bwf8398|Bwf8398]] | |||
I'm sorry, but could you give me two reasons from the link that are against the proposal? I could make changes to adhere to something I had overlooked because it has been fewer than three days if you just tell me '''how'''. [[User:Bwf8398|Bwf8398]] | I'm sorry, but could you give me two reasons from the link that are against the proposal? I could make changes to adhere to something I had overlooked because it has been fewer than three days if you just tell me '''how'''. [[User:Bwf8398|Bwf8398]] | ||