Talk:Propeller Piranha: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Merge to Jumping Piranha Plant ==
== Merge to Jumping Piranha Plant ==
{{TPP}}
Same japanese name and similar characteristics, therefore they should be merged just as was done with previous mergers like [[Goby]] and [[Cheep-Cheep]], and [[Podoboo]] and [[Lava Bubble]].  
Same japanese name and similar characteristics, therefore they should be merged just as was done with previous mergers like [[Goby]] and [[Cheep-Cheep]], and [[Podoboo]] and [[Lava Bubble]].  



Revision as of 08:09, September 8, 2011

Merge to Jumping Piranha Plant

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Saturday, May 25, 2024, 17:37 GMT

Same japanese name and similar characteristics, therefore they should be merged just as was done with previous mergers like Goby and Cheep-Cheep, and Podoboo and Lava Bubble.

Proposer:FourPaperHeroes (talk)
Deadline: September 24, 2011, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. FourPaperHeroes (talk) Per my proposal.

Oppose

  1. Tails777 (talk) They are a sub species so they deserve their own page. They may have the same Japanese name, but their appearance is different.
  2. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) Their are two many differences here different mouth, attack pattern, living area, and color
  3. Magikrazy51 (talk) What do you have against Hootie and the Blowfish? Wait, what? I'm what? Oh. Anyway, per the 15th Kuribo Karoobi Goomba's Shoe. It's a sub species like Mr. Kipper.
  4. Reddragon19k (talk) Not falling for that one! Per all!
  5. Prince Ludwig (talk) What is wrong with you? I already found out the Hootie the Blue Fish is the only one with his original name; Propeller Pakkun, since the Jumping Piranha Plant is called P-Pakkun. This is dump if an article has to be merged with another article if they share the same japanese name since they are different. So the "issue" is solved. To me, I think this was silly.
  6. Toad85 (talk) Different species, different articles. Per all.

Comments