Template talk:Gone: Difference between revisions
m (→Bring Back) |
|||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
#{{User|BoygeyMario}} Per All! :) | #{{User|BoygeyMario}} Per All! :) | ||
#{{User|YoshiGo99}} Per proposer. | #{{User|YoshiGo99}} Per proposer. | ||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} It's a nice convenience to have. | |||
===Stay Deleted=== | ===Stay Deleted=== |
Revision as of 15:48, July 24, 2011
Delete Template:Gone
Template:SettledTPP DELETE 12-5
Proposer:' Superfiremario (talk) This should be deleted. One, people hardly even use this template. Two, we shouldn't have these "user" templates because you can just put this coding down. Support
Oppose
Comments@UM's vote: No! Only 3 users used it. Only 3! Superfiremario (talk) Since I'm going to use it, I say to keep this. @DKPetey: There are 3 of the thousands of users who ever used it. A waste of space, just like spam. Arend (talk) @Arend: It is not spam! After this is deleted, what if nobody has it as a section of their user page and several years later somebody wants to use it again? I see this template as helpful. Fine then, if this is deleted, then the reminder template is useless since we can just copy the code on an user talk page. The last warning template is useless since we can just copy the code on an user talk page. And so on. DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk)
A template should be easier to notice. Besides, the Status box is not allowed for a subpage.
Try countering my arguement. Remembered Old Buddy Besides, this means that we have to delete every other template. The warning template, the blocked user template, etc. only because we can just copy the code. P.S. Color Coding is a lot more complicated.
I give up arguing. I just dislike the fact that the supporters said that this is useless. DK and Diddy Kong vs Bowser and Bowser Jr. (talk) Yes. This Superfiremario
|
Bring Back Template:Gone
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, May 31, 2024, 23:16 GMT
This template harmed no one. The fact we deleted it was just weird. Just because three people use it, doesn't mean it must be deleted. When people retire, they'll probably use this. I just want this back. Since Template:Vacation still exists, so should this!
Proposer: DKPetey99 (talk)
Deadline: August 5, 2011 23:59 GMT
Bring Back
- DKPetey99 (talk) Again, no harm in having this template.
- UltraMario3000 (talk) Per DeeKayPeeNinety-Nine.
- BoygeyMario (talk) Per All! :)
- YoshiGo99 (talk) Per proposer.
- Bowser's luma (talk) It's a nice convenience to have.
Stay Deleted
- Mario4Ever (talk) The vacation template works well enough for absences, and if and when a user retires, he or she can just announce it on his or her user page or talk page. No need for a template in order to do that.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) My reason still stands for the deletion of this template
- Zero777 (talk) per supporters in previous proposal.
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk) You've given zero new reasons as to why this template should be restored so per the original proposal this is a useless template nobody ever used it so why am i to think people will start using it now
- SWFlash (talk) Per Mario4Ever.
- Dry-Petey (talk) Per Mario4ever.