User talk:Waluigi Freak 99: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(fleshed out page.)
Line 39: Line 39:


:Thanks.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 16:22, 11 September 2006 (EDT)
:Thanks.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 16:22, 11 September 2006 (EDT)
::Did you use ''double'' brackets? Or is the problem already solved? -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
:::Oh.  Yes, I used double brackets.  I just didn't type in double brackets here because I didn't want the word "ARTICLE" to appear on the most wanted pages. ;)  It's taken care of, though.  Thanks.
:::[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 16:30, 11 September 2006 (EDT)


== Mini-games ==
== Mini-games ==
Line 70: Line 65:


::::I already asked Son of Suns,but he's offline right now. I wanted to know if you knew how. Oh, and the template is at [[Template: Special Shots]] [[User: Monty Mole|<span style="font-family:BrushScrD; color:#C0D9D9;"><font size="3"><i>Monty Mole]]</i></font></span> (<span style="font-family:Vrinda">[[User talk:Monty Mole|Talk]]&middot;[[Special: Contributions/Monty Mole|Contribs]]</span>) 20:30, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
::::I already asked Son of Suns,but he's offline right now. I wanted to know if you knew how. Oh, and the template is at [[Template: Special Shots]] [[User: Monty Mole|<span style="font-family:BrushScrD; color:#C0D9D9;"><font size="3"><i>Monty Mole]]</i></font></span> (<span style="font-family:Vrinda">[[User talk:Monty Mole|Talk]]&middot;[[Special: Contributions/Monty Mole|Contribs]]</span>) 20:30, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
== archive ==
can you make me an archive
(This previously unsigned comment was made by [[User:Superchao|Superchao]].
:I really don't know how, sorry.  See [[User:Monty Mole]] about that.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 20:16, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
::HE DIDN'T RESPOND! [[User:Superchao|Superchao]] 20:20, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
:::You can't expect him to be active every waking moment of the day; he's probably offline.  Wait; I think I might be able to figure it out.  Hold on.
:::[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 20:24, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
::::Sorry, can't help you. :(
::::[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 20:26, 24 September 2006 (EDT)
== Damsels... ==
Change the name. Damsels implies female. [[User:Superchao|Superchao]] 20:16, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
:Untrue.  Damsels can also be male.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 20:17, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
::Well, it would make more sense to say like victims. [[User:Superchao|Superchao]] 20:18, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
:::Victims would change the category.  For example, Bowser was victim to Mario's jump, but that doesn't mean he was kidnapped.  I think it's fine the way it is.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 20:19, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
Sorry to dampen your hopes, but just how many damsels are there on the wiki? It doesn't seem to warrant a PipeProject. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 20:47, 25 September 2006 (EDT)
:Technically speaking, anyone who was rescued by anyone is technically a "damsel".  But, yeah, that's why I brought it to the suggestions page first.  I'll remove it if you want me to.  It really doesn't matter if you have a Pipe Project or not, as long as you're helping the Wiki.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 17:22, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
::The only problem with the suggestion is that there aren't many articles on damsels on the wiki and there aren't many damsels total in the [[Marioverse]]. <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 17:23, 26 September 2006 (EDT)
:::True.  Suggestion removed.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 17:25, 26 September 2006 (EDT)


== Reply: Rules ==
== Reply: Rules ==


I wholeheartedly agree that some rules need to be set, then linked to in Help:Contents and {{tem|welcome}}. I will be out for 3 days, and I'll get to it then; but I must ask you, where do you see users complaining about why they have been blocked? <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 15:18, 6 October 2006 (EDT)
I wholeheartedly agree that some rules need to be set, then linked to in Help:Contents and {{tem|welcome}}. I will be out for 3 days, and I'll get to it then; but I must ask you, where do you see users complaining about why they have been blocked? <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 15:18, 6 October 2006 (EDT)
==Caption in the Waluigi picture==
I really don't want to be a pest about this, but the way that type of comparison works is the way I phrased it. Waluigi (rival #2, we'll say) is the the Wario (rival #1) to Luigi's (original #2) Mario (original #1.) It's sort of a moot point now, but I just wanted to clarify why I kept changing it.
-joeymartin64
:However, what you are saying is Waluigi is the Wario to Mario. Wario is the Wario to Mario, not Waluigi. The word "Luigi's", in this case, is a descriptive term referring to Mario. "Luigi's" describes Mario. The other way, Waluigi is the Wario to Mario's Luigi, makes "Mario's" the descriptive term. This can be removed to say Waluigi is the Wario to Luigi, which makes much more sense. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
No, I'm not. I'm saying he's the Wario to <i>Luigi's</i> Mario. There's a big difference. What it means is that Luigi is the subject (for lack of a better term), and Mario is the descriptor, being used figuratively to refer to the fact that he's the counterpart to Luigi, as Wario is the counterpart to Waluigi. Maybe it'd make more sense with quotes, like so: Waluigi is the "Wario" to Luigi's "Mario."
-joeymartin64
:It's a moot point right now anyways. Regardless, whenever you add "'s" to a noun, it becomes a descriptive term towards another noun. That's just how English grammar works. What I think you mean to say is "Waluigi is to Wario as Luigi is to Mario". Luigi's Mario doesn't make sense. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
Right, but "Mario" is being used figuratively, not literally. In this case, "Luigi's Mario" means that something attributed to Mario (him being the basis for a rival) is being used to describe Luigi. Maybe I should use a different example, as all the similar names make it a bit clunky to describe. For instance, one might say that Kazooie is the Diddy Kong to Banjo's Donkey Kong. The order of reference goes "Sidekick 2/Sidekick 1/Original 2/Original 1." Replace the Kongs with the Mario bros. (#1: DK->Mario, #2: Diddy->Luigi) and the B-K characters with the Wario bros. (#1: Banjo->Wario, #2: Kazooie->Waluigi) and you'll see what I'm getting at. I can see how that might get confusing, but "Luigi's Mario" is the proper order. But, as you say, it's moot at this point. -joeymartin64
:Why are we discussing this on my user talk page? :P  [[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 19:10, 23 October 2006 (EDT)
::I don't know. And why am I answering this on your talk page? I'm not even part of this discution?! and plus this ended so long ago. lol {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
:::Thanks for spamming my talk page.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 17:35, 30 November 2006 (EST)


== Edit summaries ==
== Edit summaries ==
Line 139: Line 81:


==Christ, I'm Sorry==
==Christ, I'm Sorry==
Well I'll be damned, good for you. Now just stop criticizing my criticisms on Waluigi! Its my opinion and yours. I"LL put some work into the article as well. I'll spice it up and add a Gallery. Sorry if we got up on the wrong foot, bud. {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
Well I'll be damned, good for you. Now just stop criticizing my criticisms on Waluigi! Its my opinion and yours. I'LL put some work into the article as well. I'll spice it up and add a Gallery. Sorry if we got up on the wrong foot, bud. {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
:It's okay.  I was a bit angry at that moment for other reasons, as well.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 13:20, 30 December 2006 (EST)
:It's okay.  I was a bit angry at that moment for other reasons, as well.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 13:20, 30 December 2006 (EST)
*I added the gallery, needs a good quote {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
::I added the gallery, needs a good quote {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
:::Quote added.  Thanks for the help.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 16:18, 17 January 2007 (EST)


== Waluigi ==
== Waluigi ==
*Hope you like the Emblem I added and info I did. The Mario Party Info should stay, its ona couple of other Articles too, like [[Wario]], my fav article. {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}
:Hope you like the Emblem I added and info I did. The Mario Party Info should stay, its ona couple of other Articles too, like [[Wario]], my fav article. {{User:WarioLoaf/sig}}


:True, but there's not as much to say about Waluigi's info, so I grouped it in with the rest of the Spin-Off games.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 14:20, 30 December 2006 (EST)
::True, but there's not as much to say about Waluigi's info, so I grouped it in with the rest of the Spin-Off games.[[User:Waluigi Freak 99|Waluigi Freak 99]] 14:20, 30 December 2006 (EST)


== TV Ep Cat ==
== TV Ep Cat ==