Yoshi Topsy-Turvy: Difference between revisions

Yoshi Topsy-Turvy (edit)

Revision as of 00:13, March 9, 2013

393 bytes added , 11 years ago

→‎Critical Reception

YoshiFan1200

1,222

edits

@@ Line 473: / Line 473: @@
 Nintendo and Artoon produced what is regarded as a mediocre title by critics. As of August 8, 2006, the game’s overall review score was 6.2/10 based on [[Wikipedia:GameRankings|GameRankings]] collection of reviews.
-[[Wikipedia:IGN|IGN]]’s Craig Harris noted that the use of the star rings to travel trough areas made the game seem rigid as some areas only lasted for seconds. He said that the characters were irritating, the storyline was stupid and the gameplay barely resembled other ''Yoshi'' games. They also caused the reviewer frustration when used in ways that made it seem like the developers were making sure players learned to pay attention. He give the game a 5/10.
+[[Wikipedia:IGN|IGN]]’s Craig Harris noted that the use of the star rings to travel trough areas made the game seem rigid as some areas only lasted for seconds. He said that the characters were irritating, the storyline was stupid and the gameplay barely resembled other ''Yoshi'' games. They also caused the reviewer frustration when used in ways that made it seem like the developers were making sure players learned to pay attention. He also said that this game is the worst game that Nintendo published to the Game Boy Advance, the tilting concept makes everything feel forcefully clumsy, and that the level design is "all over the quality spectrum, from somewhat challenging to ridiculously stupid". He gave the game a 5/10, or "Mediocre".
-[[Wikipedia:GameSpot|GameSpot]]’s Justin Calvert stated that the adventure was fun and clever when it began, but after a while, the graphics, sound and game play mechanics became repetitive. He also commented that the game was too short. He had little reason to keep playing after meeting the bare requirements for beating the game. He give the game a 6.6/10.
+[[Wikipedia:GameSpot|GameSpot]]’s Justin Calvert stated that the adventure was fun and clever when it began, but after a while, the graphics, sounds and gameplay mechanics became repetitive. He said that the game is very short, and that he had little reason to keep playing after meeting the bare requirements for beating the game. He also commented that the areas which require transformations to complete are the most enjoyable in the game. He gave the game a 6.6/10.
-[[Wikipedia:1UP.com|1UP.com]]’s Jeremy Parish stated that the game felt like it had been designed around the motion sensor, unlike ''WarioWare: Twisted!'' where it felt like the sensor was designed to fit the game. He feels that the game is just a sub-par game with choppy tilt-sensing technology thrown in. He give the game a 4/10.
+[[Wikipedia:1UP.com|1UP.com]]’s Jeremy Parish stated that the game felt like it had been designed around the motion sensor, unlike ''WarioWare: Twisted!'' where it felt like the sensor was designed to fit the game. He feels that the game is just a sub-par game with choppy tilt-sensing technology thrown in. He gave the game a 4/10.
 {{br}}