Talk:Giant Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(Trying to maintain this on all passed TPPs.) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Merge Giant Donkey Kong to [[Donkey Kong]]== | ==Merge Giant Donkey Kong to [[Donkey Kong]]== | ||
{{settledTPP}} | {{settledTPP}} | ||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">MERGE GIANT DONKEY KONG TO DONKEY KONG 15-0</span> | |||
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. | ||
{{scrollbox| | {{scrollbox| | ||
Revision as of 20:52, April 4, 2011
Merge with Donkey Kong, please. We didn't keep the Giant Kirby article, so we can't keep this... I think. My Bloody Valentine
I think we should keep it. Giant DK is a boss, not a simple effect of the Super Mushroom, like Giant Link or Giant Roy. About the Giant Kirby article, it should also be written since he's a boss as well. --Xeze 07:15, 6 February 2008 (EST)
As Xeze said, he's a boss. Even though this is a different form of DK, I think it should stay separate because of the distinctiveness of the subject in discussion. — Stooben Rooben But that's just my opinion.
Per SR. HyperToad
We should keep it, however, we will be forced to recreate the Giant Kirby article too. 
22:18, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
Should we mention the Giant DK in DK '94? The article for Giant Bowser mentions other appearances in games aside from Smash. --The Qu 03:43, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Merge Giant Donkey Kong to Donkey Kong
Template:SettledTPP MERGE GIANT DONKEY KONG TO DONKEY KONG 15-0
Using same reasoning as in Giant Kirby and for plain consistency, plus pering the above discussion, I make this suggestion to merge these two articles. Template:Scrollbox
