MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Gus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) |
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
OK, two things with this article; the first is simple: that second image looks blurry to me. If someone could fix that, that would be great. If not, well, that's OK too. ;) Secondly, is it | OK, two things with this article; the first is simple: that second image looks blurry to me. If someone could fix that, that would be great. If not, well, that's OK too. ;) Secondly, is it 4,000 characters? That's the my concern, so I'll check that out. | ||
Oh, yeah, and instead of an image of him getting hurt, might I recommend a shot of the battle with him? That would be far more exciting, in my opinion. Just trivial matters, really. ;) {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} | Oh, yeah, and instead of an image of him getting hurt, might I recommend a shot of the battle with him? That would be far more exciting, in my opinion. Just trivial matters, really. ;) {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} | ||
:OOps, 4,000. My bad. And I found that it is about 4,141 characters with that main template at the top. Without, it is about 3,646 characters. Do we include that template? If so, good job! If not, well.... Um.... Better splice some sentences. :P But yeah, it's a very good article. :D {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 16:52, January 1, 2009
Gus
Support
- Stooben Rooben (talk) - It's a well-written article that provides a lot of information on the character. There is info on his relationship with the Robbos, his battle techniques, as well as his physical appearance. Though it's on a character that has only appeared in one game, it contains enough information to be a Featured Article.
- Per Stooby. ToadetteAnime4evur (talk)
- Super-Yoshi (talk) - Looks good to me, Per St00by.
- Grapes (talk) Per Stooby.
Oppose
Comments
OK, two things with this article; the first is simple: that second image looks blurry to me. If someone could fix that, that would be great. If not, well, that's OK too. ;) Secondly, is it 4,000 characters? That's the my concern, so I'll check that out.
Oh, yeah, and instead of an image of him getting hurt, might I recommend a shot of the battle with him? That would be far more exciting, in my opinion. Just trivial matters, really. ;) .
- OOps, 4,000. My bad. And I found that it is about 4,141 characters with that main template at the top. Without, it is about 3,646 characters. Do we include that template? If so, good job! If not, well.... Um.... Better splice some sentences. :P But yeah, it's a very good article. :D .
