User talk:Trogga: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
King Mario (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==What I Meant== | ==What I Meant== | ||
I was trying to say that we should go more in-depth about the similarities and differences of a "clone" character in relation to the original character than to just say they are clones. In other words, if we include such a discription, the need to say x is a clone of y is negligated. You were arguing for conciseness, but I'm saying that it isn't an issue if we include all the detail we should. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 22:14, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | I was trying to say that we should go more in-depth about the similarities and differences of a "clone" character in relation to the original character than to just say they are clones. In other words, if we include such a discription, the need to say x is a clone of y is negligated. You were arguing for conciseness, but I'm saying that it isn't an issue if we include all the detail we should. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 22:14, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
:I'll just upload the other Kirby hat in another one. You don't have to revert it {{User:King Mario/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 19:49, April 19, 2008
Greetings!
Greetings, Trogga! I know you aren't new, but I would like to know more about you. I am Glitz Hawk and I have many friends here on the wiki. How about you? How many of your pals are here on the wiki? Last question. Do you like the Homestar Runner cartoons? Your name looks like "Trogdor", am I right?
Nice to meet you! 
Glitz
Hawk Go to the Homestar Runner website if you don't know what the HECK I'm talking about. You will CRACK UP!
P.S. The link is here: [1]
- Hi Glitz Hawk. I don't really have any friends on wiki; I'm kinda an Exopedian. But I do indeed like Homestar Runner. --Trogga 21:09, 28 February 2008 (EST)
re
1st: Don't have clones in brawl 2nd: With it's deffirent, isn't a clone McWolf
What I Meant
I was trying to say that we should go more in-depth about the similarities and differences of a "clone" character in relation to the original character than to just say they are clones. In other words, if we include such a discription, the need to say x is a clone of y is negligated. You were arguing for conciseness, but I'm saying that it isn't an issue if we include all the detail we should. Stumpers! 22:14, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
