User talk:Porplemontage/Archive 13: Difference between revisions

Line 957: Line 957:
:I want to convey as much info about the moons as possible, and images are an important part of that. We could do a gallery, but then you'd put the moon number and name as the caption and lose the description, which is also important (unless you, uh, linked to a separate article for each moon). The table is the only option to include all the info I want while keeping everything on one page. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 17:07, 2 November 2017 (EDT)
:I want to convey as much info about the moons as possible, and images are an important part of that. We could do a gallery, but then you'd put the moon number and name as the caption and lose the description, which is also important (unless you, uh, linked to a separate article for each moon). The table is the only option to include all the info I want while keeping everything on one page. --{{User:Porplemontage/sig}} 17:07, 2 November 2017 (EDT)
::Understood. In an effort to keep things simple and not overrun the kingdom pages with the ghastly large tables, I suppose I now support making separate articles.--{{User:Eldritchdraaks/sig}} 17:15, 2 November 2017 (EDT)
::Understood. In an effort to keep things simple and not overrun the kingdom pages with the ghastly large tables, I suppose I now support making separate articles.--{{User:Eldritchdraaks/sig}} 17:15, 2 November 2017 (EDT)
::However until the proposal has gone through and a decision has been made, can we default to the simpler lists? Just until that point. It will provide the same necessary information, minus the picture which will already take a long time to obtain.--{{User:Eldritchdraaks/sig}} 17:20, 2 November 2017 (EDT)
8,523

edits