Talk:Spine Coaster: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[MarioWiki:Warning Policy +[[MarioWiki:Warning policy))
Line 34: Line 34:
Anyone mind that I made the move prematurely? Its not like the Oppose side would grow within two days, anyway. [[User:DonnyKD|DonnyKD]] ([[User talk:DonnyKD|talk]]) 05:05, 21 December 2012 (EST)
Anyone mind that I made the move prematurely? Its not like the Oppose side would grow within two days, anyway. [[User:DonnyKD|DonnyKD]] ([[User talk:DonnyKD|talk]]) 05:05, 21 December 2012 (EST)


:[[MarioWiki:Warning Policy#Level Two Offenses|Enforcing a proposal before it has been passed]] is a level two offense. Please don't do it again. Just let the TPP run until the deadline. Until then, I'm moving the pages back.  
:[[MarioWiki:Warning policy#Level Two Offenses|Enforcing a proposal before it has been passed]] is a level two offense. Please don't do it again. Just let the TPP run until the deadline. Until then, I'm moving the pages back.  


:{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 05:11, 21 December 2012 (EST)
:{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 05:11, 21 December 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 00:18, August 18, 2016

Bonecoasters also appear in sm3d land...--Boidoh 13:04, 23 December 2011 (EST)

Could you add the info? -Four Paper Heroes FourPaperHeroes.jpg 13:07, 23 December 2011 (EST)

Move Bonecoaster to Spine Coaster

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

MOVE ARTICLE 8-0

First of all, I think we should move Bonecoaster to Spine Coaster, because the former was from NSMBWii's Prima guide, and the latter was from NSMBU (it says so in the levels it's in). According to this, in-game names take priority over Prima. Also, I think we should move NSMB2 info to Skull Raft as they have more characteristics of them than Bonecoasters (Skull Rafts cruise along the lava, Bonecoasters go on a track over it).

Proposer: YoshiCookie (talk)
Deadline: December 22, 2012, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. YoshiCookie (talk) Per proposal.
  2. 1337star (talk) Per the part of the proposal that pertains to this. Can't say I agree with the other part of it, though, pretty much for the same reasons as Marshall Dan Troop.
  3. BowserJunior (talk) See below comment.
  4. Walkazo (talk) - Per BowserJunior.
  5. DonnyKD (talk) - Per BowserJunior.
  6. Blue CosmicToad (talk) - Per (updated) proposal
  7. MegaKoopa (talk) - I agree with both parts.
  8. RandomYoshi (talk) - Per all.

Oppose

Comments

They don't really act like Skull Rafts since they move around and stuff also Skull Rafts weren't living creatures they were like 4 skulls tied together. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)

Spine Coaster is definitely more official…I mean, it's IN-GAME!! But about the NSMB2 skull creature…I actually think they're a completely different thing.-BowserJunior (talk)

You're right...they don't really act like Spine Coasters at all, but not Skull Rafts either. What would we call it though, Spine Raft? Is there a name in the Prima guide (since levels don't have names in NSMB2)? YoshiCookie (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2015 (EST)
Proposal changed. YoshiCookie (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2015 (EST)

Anyone mind that I made the move prematurely? Its not like the Oppose side would grow within two days, anyway. DonnyKD (talk) 05:05, 21 December 2012 (EST)

Enforcing a proposal before it has been passed is a level two offense. Please don't do it again. Just let the TPP run until the deadline. Until then, I'm moving the pages back.
'Shroom Spotlight Shokora (talk · edits) 05:11, 21 December 2012 (EST)