Talk:List of Star Point amounts in Paper Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Megadardery (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I do agree it looks like a bunch of clutter, but I think we could keep the page if we had smaller tables. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 09:11, 26 December 2015 (EST) | :I do agree it looks like a bunch of clutter, but I think we could keep the page if we had smaller tables. {{User:Roy Koopa/sig}} 09:11, 26 December 2015 (EST) | ||
::It's because some people may not be interested in calculating the formula themselves and can look at the tables for quick reference -- even for those reasons you mentioned above, Megadardery. If there's a better way to make the tables smaller and more efficient, we should still keep this page. --[[User:Zootalo|Zootalo]] ([[User talk:Zootalo|talk]]) 09:20, 26 December 2015 (EST) | ::It's because some people may not be interested in calculating the formula themselves and can look at the tables for quick reference -- even for those reasons you mentioned above, Megadardery. If there's a better way to make the tables smaller and more efficient, we should still keep this page. --[[User:Zootalo|Zootalo]] ([[User talk:Zootalo|talk]]) 09:20, 26 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:::The formula is not complicated enough to consider this a "quick reference". I'm sorry, but I don't see any way on how this might stay. Perhaps the most important reason is that it doesn't contain information for ''every single combination of enemies'' that can be found in the game, and if it did, it will be much much worse. And the fact that it contains information for combinations that cannot be found in the game at any point.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 09:31, 26 December 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:31, December 26, 2015
Necessity
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Is this page necessary? Don't get me wrong it's not bad, in fact it includes a good piece of information about the star points formula. But aside from that, it's a very long page that includes space-inefficient tables. Those tables include so much unneeded info, if you have the formula, you should be able to get all these info yourself. Which brings up my question.. Can we merge the "introduction" for this article into the Star Points article (if it doesn't already contain this info) and then delete this list?--
08:53, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- I do agree it looks like a bunch of clutter, but I think we could keep the page if we had smaller tables.
J-Luigi (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- It's because some people may not be interested in calculating the formula themselves and can look at the tables for quick reference -- even for those reasons you mentioned above, Megadardery. If there's a better way to make the tables smaller and more efficient, we should still keep this page. --Zootalo (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- The formula is not complicated enough to consider this a "quick reference". I'm sorry, but I don't see any way on how this might stay. Perhaps the most important reason is that it doesn't contain information for every single combination of enemies that can be found in the game, and if it did, it will be much much worse. And the fact that it contains information for combinations that cannot be found in the game at any point.--09:31, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- The formula is not complicated enough to consider this a "quick reference". I'm sorry, but I don't see any way on how this might stay. Perhaps the most important reason is that it doesn't contain information for every single combination of enemies that can be found in the game, and if it did, it will be much much worse. And the fact that it contains information for combinations that cannot be found in the game at any point.--
- It's because some people may not be interested in calculating the formula themselves and can look at the tables for quick reference -- even for those reasons you mentioned above, Megadardery. If there's a better way to make the tables smaller and more efficient, we should still keep this page. --Zootalo (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2015 (EST)
