Editing User talk:YoshiFan/ Archive 1
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 300: | Line 300: | ||
==Reply: Wario FA== | ==Reply: Wario FA== | ||
I have nothing against the Wario article. It is a good article - I just do not think it is FA quality. The writing is poor, the biography incomplete, and there is a lot of fanon as well. Many issues were never resolved from previous evaluations, that's why it appears more pop up each time. Some things are being fixed, but not all things. I put the template on the Wario page to get some attention for the article. When people see it, they will know they have to rewrite and expand the biography, which it desperately needs. I will note that not one sysop has supported the article. That does not mean sysops are more important than users (cause they aren't), it just means the the older sysops, who have been here for a long time, don't think the article is FA quality (and they may have a better idea of what FA quality is). Check out the other FAs for a better idea of what an FA quality article should look like. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | I have nothing against the Wario article. It is a good article - I just do not think it is FA quality. The writing is poor, the biography incomplete, and there is a lot of fanon as well. Many issues were never resolved from previous evaluations, that's why it appears more pop up each time. Some things are being fixed, but not all things. I put the template on the Wario page to get some attention for the article. When people see it, they will know they have to rewrite and expand the biography, which it desperately needs. I will note that not one sysop has supported the article. That does not mean sysops are more important than users (cause they aren't), it just means the the older sysops, who have been here for a long time, don't think the article is FA quality (and they may have a better idea of what FA quality is). Check out the other FAs for a better idea of what an FA quality article should look like. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||