Editing The 'Shroom talk:Issue 203/Poll Committee Chairperson Election
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
*I would allow the creators of polls to post polls in the MarioWiki Poll Discussion page themselves. | *I would allow the creators of polls to post polls in the MarioWiki Poll Discussion page themselves. | ||
*I would make sure that the forum's Poll Committee subforum would be used very predominantly to discuss poll ideas instead of Discord, so that the users who prefer a slower-paced, relaxing feel instead of a more intense one would feel at home. However, using the Poll Committee chat there would be encouraged as well, but strictly not made a requirement. | *I would make sure that the forum's Poll Committee subforum would be used very predominantly to discuss poll ideas instead of Discord, so that the users who prefer a slower-paced, relaxing feel instead of a more intense one would feel at home. However, using the Poll Committee chat there would be encouraged as well, but strictly not made a requirement. | ||
*I am hoping to have minimum of seven people to join the Poll Committee, so as to increase the scale of fun interactions. I would not have a limit on what number of people would be allowed to join the Poll Committee, assuming that anyone who applied had a good record as in avoiding warnings from wiki/forum/Discord moderation or bans. Previous egregious behavior even outside of the Mario Wiki community such as racism, homophobia, bullying, et cetera would also do nothing whatsoever to help one's chances. | *I am hoping to have minimum of seven people to join the Poll Committee, so as to increase the scale of fun interactions. I would not have a limit on what number of people would be allowed to join the Poll Committee, assuming that anyone who applied had a good record as in avoiding warnings from wiki/forum/Discord moderation or bans. Previous egregious behavior even outside of the Mario Wiki community such as racism, homophobia, bullying, et cetera would also do nothing whatsoever to help one's chances. The current committee had the policy of allowing previously rejected users to reapply with the understanding that if others do not consider them to have improved they will not be accepted, which I would keep. However, I would also expand on this policy by allowing applications for the 15th Poll Committee to be analyzed by every user in the 14th Poll Committee, so even lower-ranking users aside from their role on the Committee would have a say in voicing comfort or discomfort. | ||
*I would make minor changes to the earlier archives as chairperson, so as to correct previous errors. | *I would make minor changes to the earlier archives as chairperson, so as to correct previous errors. | ||
*I would have a hybrid model of the standard Poll Committee system and the 11th Poll Committee system. So, there would still be the opt-in system designated to giving one user extra power to focus on a poll and create it with other users, but there would be other weeks designated to the consensus-based system where which poll went up would depend on which one had the most votes, so as to have a more relaxed feel. The number of weeks that would be designated to a consensus vote would be one out of four. | *I would have a hybrid model of the standard Poll Committee system and the 11th Poll Committee system. So, there would still be the opt-in system designated to giving one user extra power to focus on a poll and create it with other users, but there would be other weeks designated to the consensus-based system where which poll went up would depend on which one had the most votes, so as to have a more relaxed feel. The number of weeks that would be designated to a consensus vote would be one out of four. |