Talk:Mecha Cheep

Clockwork, not a propeller

Look closely and you'll see that. BooDestroyer (talk) 21:28, 11 December 2012 (EST)

you're right. Marioyoshi (talk)

Name

Is it official that it is called the propeller Cheep-Cheep. If anything (if it is not official) i'd call it a Mecha-Cheep (they resemble Mecha-Koopas) until we know the official name. 86.148.118.231 06:59, 22 December 2012 (EST)

It is not Official, but the real name is not known. Don't move it unless it's official. Mecha-Cheep is not official.--Revenge Of Kurbio 08:22, 22 December 2012 (EST)

When choosing a conjectural name, it should be as brief and as accurate as possible. Personally, Propeller Cheep-Cheep seems distinguishing enough for a conjectural name. There is very little point in moving a conjectural title to another conjectural title, unless there widespread community support that the new conjectural name is more suitable.

Shokora (talk · edits) 08:27, 22 December 2012 (EST)

Exactly.--Revenge Of Kurbio 08:35, 22 December 2012 (EST)

But it has NOTHING to do with PROPELLORS! it is mechanical and has a thing that wides up Mecha-Koopas. That's not a propellor. A mecha-cheep is far more brief than Propellor Cheep-Cheep. and i have a good reason. so it should really Be mecha-Cheep for the time-and-being! 86.148.118.231 10:26, 22 December 2012 (EST)

If you feel that it is a more suitable name, then feel free to make a talk page proposal. However, you need to create an account in order to be allowed to do so. Also see here for other benefits of creating an account.

Shokora (talk · edits) 10:32, 22 December 2012 (EST)

You know, he has a point. still, there is no point on moving conj. names to other conj. pages. but still, it is worth looking at...--Revenge Of Kurbio 10:33, 22 December 2012 (EST)