Talk:Bone Twister: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==New name== {{talk}} The [https://archive.ph/IMSwG English Mario Portal] has a new name for this enemy: '''Bone Twister'''. Now, I don't want to jump the gun on this one sinc...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
{{talk}}
{{talk}}
The [https://archive.ph/IMSwG English Mario Portal] has a new name for this enemy: '''Bone Twister'''. Now, I don't want to jump the gun on this one since the current name is English and has been around since 2007 (basically its only appearance barring ''3D All-Stars''). However, the article does use an identifier, so the newer name would be more convenient, and perhaps more technically accurate if it's not considered a Tweester. I do want to point out that web content, especially non-guide material, has the same naming priority as the trading card that this came from. I'm curious if others think this should be moved or kept. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 21:01, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
The [https://archive.ph/IMSwG English Mario Portal] has a new name for this enemy: '''Bone Twister'''. Now, I don't want to jump the gun on this one since the current name is English and has been around since 2007 (basically its only appearance barring ''3D All-Stars''). However, the article does use an identifier, so the newer name would be more convenient, and perhaps more technically accurate if it's not considered a Tweester. I do want to point out that web content, especially non-guide material, has the same naming priority as the trading card that this came from. I'm curious if others think this should be moved or kept. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 21:01, August 13, 2022 (EDT)
:''Do'' these two sources have the same naming priority? Looking at [[MarioWiki:Naming]], I understood "officially Nintendo-licensed" to mean "third-party." That would apply to the trading cards, but surely not to content published on Nintendo's own website, right?<br />
:Anyway, I think it's fine to move this article to Bone Twister. [[User:PopeLuigi|PopeLuigi]] ([[User talk:PopeLuigi|talk]]) 22:13, August 13, 2022 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:14, August 13, 2022

New name

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

The English Mario Portal has a new name for this enemy: Bone Twister. Now, I don't want to jump the gun on this one since the current name is English and has been around since 2007 (basically its only appearance barring 3D All-Stars). However, the article does use an identifier, so the newer name would be more convenient, and perhaps more technically accurate if it's not considered a Tweester. I do want to point out that web content, especially non-guide material, has the same naming priority as the trading card that this came from. I'm curious if others think this should be moved or kept. LinkTheLefty (talk) 21:01, August 13, 2022 (EDT)

Do these two sources have the same naming priority? Looking at MarioWiki:Naming, I understood "officially Nintendo-licensed" to mean "third-party." That would apply to the trading cards, but surely not to content published on Nintendo's own website, right?
Anyway, I think it's fine to move this article to Bone Twister. PopeLuigi (talk) 22:13, August 13, 2022 (EDT)