MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Games
Alrigt, Whoever deleted my Mario's Sailor Job thing PUT IT BACK!!!!!Gumball of the Stars (talk)
- No it was never an article Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- That's what I was gonna say >:O Yoshiwaker (talk)
- I DON'T CARE IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!!!!!!!!! Gumball of the Stars (talk)
- Jeez, calm down.
! 14:43, 13 July 2011 (EDT)
- I actually thought that would be useful I'm using it for Fake News. Gumball of the Stars (talk)
- I actually thought that would be useful I'm using it for Fake News.
- Jeez, calm down.
- I DON'T CARE IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!!!!!!!!!
- That's what I was gonna say >:O Yoshiwaker (talk)
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Loves
Nintendo Land
I remember on that day the 2012 chat party about The 'Shroom when Marshal Dan Troop blocked an IP adress for 3 months because that person went to Nintendo Land and replaced all of the content on that page with "SUPER MARIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" or something like that. That person also went to the Game & Wario page and replaced the content with "LOL". Do any of you people think that this vandalism should be added? It looks like BJAODN material to me.
-signed, KoopaGuy (talk) aka John Roberts 16:12, 4 January 2013 (EST)
Remove Ice Climbers section
It isn't funny. I've read it twice now and haven't found any notable mistakes worth laughing at. I think it should be removed. 
(T · C) 13:31, 27 September 2015 (EDT)
- It's one of the silliest run-on sentences I've ever seen. As a marvel of grammar alone, it should stay. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- It's technically not a run-on, but it's so egregiously lumped with prepositional phrase after prepositional phrase that it's terrible writing and guaranteed to make you skim over. I don't think it's quite BJAODN worthy, since it's purely awful writing, but you can keep that.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:21, 27 September 2015 (EDT)
- It's technically not a run-on, but it's so egregiously lumped with prepositional phrase after prepositional phrase that it's terrible writing and guaranteed to make you skim over. I don't think it's quite BJAODN worthy, since it's purely awful writing, but you can keep that.
What pertains to BJAODN, and what doesn't?
I feel like adding some nonsense to this ridiculous thing we have on the wiki, but I've always been under mental conflict, because I am still confused as to what is worthy to be featured in BJAODN, and what isn't. - MarioManiac1981 User talk:MarioManiac1981 MarioManiac1981 (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2018 (EDT)
P.S., fix my mistake there. - MarioManiac1981 (talk) MarioManiac1981 (talk) 19:25, 27 October 2018 (EDT)
Gah! I made another one! MarioManiac1981 (talk) 19:26, 27 October 2018 (EDT)
- In terms of this game section, usually it's poorly written entries or vandalism that has been found funny enough to keep. You shouldn't intentionally write something bad just to get in on BJAODN, there's an example of why on the main page.
19:27, 27 October 2018 (EDT)
