MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!" "Vote" periods last for one week. All past proposals are archived. A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{user|User name}}. Signing with the signature code ~~~(~) is not allowed due to technical issues. How To Actions that users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument. Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at: Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm) Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm) Sunday: 15:00 (3pm) Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has no merit or was cast in bad faith. However, there must be strong reasons supporting the invalidation. "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line. Any proposal that has three votes or less at deadline will automatically be listed as "NO QUORUM." The original proposer then has the option to relist said proposal to generate more discussion. All proposals are archived. The original proposer must take action accordingly if the outcome of the proposal dictates it. If it requires the help of a sysop, the proposer can ask for that help. There are two topics that cannot be decided on through a proposal: the first is sysop promotions and demotions, which are decided by Bureaucrats. Secondly, no proposals calling for the creation of Banjo, Conker or Sonic series articles are allowed (several proposals supporting them have failed in recent history). The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after work/school, weekend nights). If a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. CURRENTLY: 09:06, 13 May 2024 (EST) New Features Mario Cameos Outside of Mario Games Page I have recently been reading a lot of online stuff and watching a lot of television stuff. Also I have been playing some non Mario and non Nintendo games seeing Mario and other characters appearances. I think that we should make a page that states the cameos of all the Mario characters in Telivision and other Game Media. Please support me in this. Proposer Luigibros2 Deadline December 21, 12:00 Support Luigibros2 Oppose Comments Removals Bowser FA Nomination It has come to my attention that the Featured Article nomination for Bowser is a dreadful mess. Since it's been around for over a year (September 2007!), many of the opposes are out of date or from retired users, which make them very difficult to remove. Although personally I think the Bowser article is too long to be Featured (it needs to be condensed), the FA Nomination page should be deleted and it should be nominated again later (after a bit of revising, of course). Proposer: Daniel Webster (talk) Deadline: December 22, 17:00 Support Daniel Webster (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2008 (EST) Leirin (talk) I see what you're saying. While it's a good article because it contains a LOT of information, it's sorta sloppy. We need to make some big changes before it can be featured, in my opinion. Leirin 15:51, 15 December 2008 (EST) Oppose Time Q (talk): I don't know if you noticed it, but at the bottom of the nomination page there's a section "Removal of Oppose Votes". Just put your vote there, along with a reason, and when there's five votes for an oppose vote, it will be removed (provided that it's invalid). For the valid opposes, try contacting the users. No need to delete the page IMO. Stumpers (talk) - I'm sure that people, myself included, would agree to remove a valid oppose if the user who opposed was no longer an active user. If nothing else, I'm sure some active user would adopt the oppose if it was still valid. Stooben Rooben (talk) - Per Time Q. If you want a vote removed, use the removal system. And if you need users to actually pay attention to it, contact them on their talk page about it — as long as it's in a neutral manner. Walkazo (talk) - We made the removal system so Proposals like this wouldn't be necessary. Sooo... Per Stooben Rooben (and thus, per Time Q as well). InfectedShroom (talk) - Eh, I helped make the removal system, so I guess I'll support it. Per all. Comments Time Q: Hardly anyone is using those so nothing is getting done and the poor page is stuck in limbo. Daniel Webster (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2008 (EST) Stumpers: I wouldn't be so sure, considering that deletion request thing was up there a couple months with no activity. This proposal will probably bring to mind the page, but it was dormant for quite a while. Just my two cents... InfectedShroom (talk) PS: thanks, Stoobs, for correcting my stupid sig habit. :P No prob, I still do it sometimes too. :P Stooben Rooben (talk) Uh... am I missing something, or is Leirin's vote not really referring to Daniel's point? Time Q (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2008 (EST) Splits & Merges None at the moment. Changes None at the moment. Miscellaneous None at the moment.