User talk:92.23.120.66
Writing Standards
Greetings! I've noticed you making various edits on Paper Mario-related articles, such as Shadow Sirens. However, I must tell you that you've been writing far too flowery. According to wiki rule, one must write in a simple, easy-to-understand syntax, and not as though they're attempting to write an epic. Thank you, and have a nice day. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 19:01, 9 September 2017 (EDT)
Must be some IP confusion, I haven't edited the Shadow Sirens article. 92.23.120.66 10:53, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
- I believe he was referring to your edit on Ms. Mowz, which contained a lot of flowery writing. Please read MarioWiki:Good writing for more information. --
TheFlameChomp (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
My edit to Ms Mowz contained no such flowery writing and significantly improved the article in several respects. It's likely that due to confusion with another IP the editor is being overzealous and not checking for consistency. Regardless, if another editor would like to highlight what he believes to be examples then he can bring them up in discussion. 92.23.120.66 11:10, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
I'm taking the time to read through the edits made by another to the Shadow Sirens page, and my suspicions prove correct. Although I wouldn't describe much of what that user added to the article as "flowery" at all, there's a lot of irrelevant detail added that doesn't develop the article. It bears no resemblance to the sole edit made by myself to Ms. Mowz's page.
I understand that IP confusion occurs, and skim reading and editing when trying to clearup happens and is forgiveable. 92.23.120.66 11:22, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
- Regardless, you are edit warring, which will lead to a ban if it keeps up. Please discuss this with the other users involved.
11:26, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
An offer for a discussion has been extended in the edit notes of the page. No more edits or revertions have occurred within the following 24 minutes or so - I'll keep an eye on the page, and will assume the issue is resolved if neither a discussion nor another reversion occur. 92.23.120.66 11:35, 10 September 2017 (EDT)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
