Talk:Leo Luster: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Comments) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - This could be expanded but just like King Koopa's numerous different names don't have articles, neither should a different name for Bluster Kong. | #{{User|Marioguy1}} - This could be expanded but just like King Koopa's numerous different names don't have articles, neither should a different name for Bluster Kong. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per all. | #{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Mr.C}} - Per all. | |||
===Oppose Merge=== | ===Oppose Merge=== | ||
Revision as of 20:23, December 3, 2010
Merge Leo Luster into Bluster Kong
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Thursday, May 23, 2024, 08:04 GMT
Using the same logic we used in merging Nurse Toadstool with Princess Peach, shouldn't this be merged as well? Not to mention there isn't to much information on this page to begin with.
Proposer: Knife (talk)
Voting start: 2 December, 2010, 11:50
Deadline: 16 December, 2010 23:59 GMT.
Support Merge
- Knife (talk) – Per proposal reasons.
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) Per Knife.
- Marioguy1 (talk) - This could be expanded but just like King Koopa's numerous different names don't have articles, neither should a different name for Bluster Kong.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all.
- Mr.C (talk) - Per all.
Oppose Merge
Comments
@Marioguy1: A bunch of King Koopa's alter egos actually do have articles for some reason; according to King Koopa's alter egos, eight of them do, with one having featured status. (Just wanted to point this out, I'm not saying Leo Luster should definitely keep his own article because of this.)--vellidragon 03:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Honestly? Consistency fail much >_>
