MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Koopa Paratroopa

Koopa Paratroopa

Support

1. KS3 (talk) A great article with a lot of pictures, minimal amount of errors, and everything needed for a great FA.
2. Toadwell (talk)

Oppose

1. Reversinator (talk) Some of the sections are one-liners, and there are some grammatical errors as well.
2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Why is there a messed-up looking Paper Mario statistics section? Some sections are very short and others can use a little more images.
3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though I like Paratroopa, I don't think this should be featured. Some info is missing. One example is New Super Mario Bros. Wii (and some others, but I added some too).
4. Commander Code-8 (talk) How can you say it has lots of images?

Removal of Opposes

Commander Code-8

1. KS3 (talk) It has a lot of images, unlike what you said.
2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This article has a bucket load of images compared to Geno and the Shadow Queen, which are also featured articles.

LeftyGreenMario

1. KS3 (talk) The Paper Mario stats are fixed and there are no one-liners.

Comments

@Commander Code-8: Well, it actually does have a good amount of images. Bloc Partier (talk)

TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I don't think it's fixed. I think the idea is to put the two right next to each other, so the page isn't so long. I didn't see it before, though, so I could be wrong. Bloc Partier (talk)

I attempted to do that, but I couldn't. At least it's better than the last one; that's a real mess. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Yeah, it would be even better if they were all next to each other, but thanks anyway. Removing my vote. Time Q (talk)

Hmmm... We got it fixed on the Dry Bones article, if I remember correctly. I'll try to fix it. Bloc Partier (talk)