User talk:Ninelevendo: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) (Replaced content with "{| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px" |- ! align="center" | '''Archiv...") Tag: Replaced |
(→Low quality?! (Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour article): new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive3]]''' | *'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive3]]''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Low quality?! (''Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour'' article) == | |||
I just noticed earlier today that said edits that I made in terms of respectful "image reversion attempts" on the ''Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour'' article was undone by you as well, but saying that that the "images were low quality". Care to explain this to me, just to be sure? My intention when checking that section was for most of the "positive animation" stuff that the Mario female characters (Peach/Daisy) would be the best to "demonstrate" this. --M. C. - [[User:MeritC|Profile]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 19:16, November 9, 2020 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:16, November 9, 2020
| Archives
|
|---|
Low quality?! (Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour article)
I just noticed earlier today that said edits that I made in terms of respectful "image reversion attempts" on the Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour article was undone by you as well, but saying that that the "images were low quality". Care to explain this to me, just to be sure? My intention when checking that section was for most of the "positive animation" stuff that the Mario female characters (Peach/Daisy) would be the best to "demonstrate" this. --M. C. - Profile | Talk Page 19:16, November 9, 2020 (EST)
