MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Dr. Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
BabyLuigi64 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
BabyLuigi64 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{user|Laikue}} I'm gonna be frank here, this article was in no position to be featured in the first place, I'm a sub-par editor, and (as you can see in the five most recent edits on the page) I had to fix up so many parts of the page, and even after that, some sections are too short (Dr. Mario Express), too wordy (the super smash bros. section), or contains too much information pertaining to the series rather than the character (Smash Bros. section again, as well as all over the article.), in short, it's not a good article, and I would fix it up more myself, but, as I said before, I am a sub-par editor and this article essentially needs a total overhaul from a more experienced editor. | #{{user|Laikue}} I'm gonna be frank here, this article was in no position to be featured in the first place, I'm a sub-par editor, and (as you can see in the five most recent edits on the page) I had to fix up so many parts of the page, and even after that, some sections are too short (Dr. Mario Express), too wordy (the super smash bros. section), or contains too much information pertaining to the series rather than the character (Smash Bros. section again, as well as all over the article.), in short, it's not a good article, and I would fix it up more myself, but, as I said before, I am a sub-par editor and this article essentially needs a total overhaul from a more experienced editor. | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigi64}} | #{{User|BabyLuigi64}} I don't think there are any problems, because: | ||
##Short sections are okay as long as they cannot be expanded on further without unnecessary sentences and flowery writing. | ##Short sections are okay as long as they cannot be expanded on further without unnecessary sentences and flowery writing. | ||
##I don't see what you mean by "too wordy", but too long doesn't exist here, so I don't see a problem with the Smash Bros. section. | ##I don't see what you mean by "too wordy", but too long doesn't exist here, so I don't see a problem with the Smash Bros. section. | ||
Revision as of 21:52, November 17, 2014
Dr. Mario
Remove Featured Article Status
- Laikue (talk) I'm gonna be frank here, this article was in no position to be featured in the first place, I'm a sub-par editor, and (as you can see in the five most recent edits on the page) I had to fix up so many parts of the page, and even after that, some sections are too short (Dr. Mario Express), too wordy (the super smash bros. section), or contains too much information pertaining to the series rather than the character (Smash Bros. section again, as well as all over the article.), in short, it's not a good article, and I would fix it up more myself, but, as I said before, I am a sub-par editor and this article essentially needs a total overhaul from a more experienced editor.
Keep Featured Article Status
- BabyLuigi64 (talk) I don't think there are any problems, because:
- Short sections are okay as long as they cannot be expanded on further without unnecessary sentences and flowery writing.
- I don't see what you mean by "too wordy", but too long doesn't exist here, so I don't see a problem with the Smash Bros. section.
- I see no part of the History section that refers to the series. I guess the "Remakes and compilations" section is unnecessary, but since it's easy to hit the edit button and remove that section, that's no reason to unfeature the article.
So yeah, it should stay featured, as far as I can tell.
