MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 3D World

Super Mario 3D World

Support

1. WeHatePoisonMushrooms66 (talk) That shall be featured. I never saw it featured.
2. SuperLeaf1 (talk)
3. Agentdave7 (talk)

Oppose

1. Yoshi876 (talk) Imcomplete article. And when the game is released there will probably be tonnes of red links as well as several improvement templates scattering the article.
2. Baby Luigi (talk) What the hell, the game isn't even out yet. And when it does come out, it doesn't instantly make it a featured article. It's just like Super Mario Galaxy 2, where the article still has issues.
3. Ztar Power (talk) Game not released, please wait until all information can be confirmed.
4. Cevan (talk) The game isn't even out yet, meaning that not all of the information about the game is on here yet. Why would it be featured at its current state?
5. Peteyking64 (talk) I would rather wait a while after it comes out and we know the whole plot of the game first
6. Stickers4U (talk) I agree with Petey, I want it as an article, but not until it's released.
7. Icemario11 (talk) Article is incomplete and the subject of it hasn't even been released yet.
8. Super Elite Army Hammer Bro (talk) No way! The game isn't even out yet!
9. Skittles (talk) The game is not released, and the article is still under construction and incomplete. Give it a while after it comes out to feature it.
10. YoshiGo99 (talk) I have the feeling they don't understand what a featured article is, I have the idea they think featured articles are like big or popular or upcoming games or something along those lines, No they are not. But besides that, I have to agree with the rest of them.
11. GoofyfanG56 (talk) Pretty much what everyone else said who's opposing. The game is not even out yet and the article's still incomplete.
12. Tails777 (talk) I'm not really sure the support reason is even valid. Just because you've never seen it featured, doesn't mean it should be. But the main thing has already been covered by everyone else: it isn't even out yet.
13. NapalmRosalina (talk) MAN! This game have not yet been realsed, and there are a lot of red links!
14. Scr7 (talk) Let me think... how about no. Per all.
15. Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk) Try again once it's released. Right now we don't have enough for it to be featured.

Removal of Opposes

WeHatePoisonMushrooms66

1. Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk) Just because it hasn't been featured doesn't mean it should be. (I can do this right?)

Comments

This... well, this is one of the flaws about the FA system.

Shokora (talk · edits) 09:41, 31 October 2013 (EDT)

You mean that the FA nomination template will remain until late December, even though the article isn't fit to be featured now, and probably won't be still in December. Yoshi876 (talk)

No no no it's not that complicated. It's that there's nothing stopping people from making asinine nominations such as this, and rather than outright cancelling it we have to go through the whole process as if it's a serious nomination.

Shokora (talk · edits) 09:48, 31 October 2013 (EDT)

I was actually thinking of creating a proposal to allow FA and UNFA nominations to fail before the two month deadline if there's a majority of opposers with valid reasons and counter-arguments aren't provided. Yoshi876 (talk)

That's too complicated for me.

Shokora (talk · edits) 09:51, 31 October 2013 (EDT)

I'll make it simpler in the proposal don't worry. Yoshi876 (talk)