Talk:Fortress: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
#{{User|BluePiranha}} Per my proposal. | #{{User|BluePiranha}} Per my proposal. | ||
#{{User|1337star}} Both are essentially the same level type (the mid-world or secret variant of the [[Castle]]). While that normally wouldn't be worth a merge to me, the fact that post-''NSMB'', fortresses became much like that game's Towers is enough for me to say merge 'em. | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
Actually, why don't we just move over the NSMB info to the tower page instead of merging? NSMB's fortresses may be towers, but the SMB3, SMW, and end of level fortresses are not. [[User:DonnyKD|DonnyKD]] ([[User talk:DonnyKD|talk]]) 16:03, 6 December 2012 (EST) | Actually, why don't we just move over the NSMB info to the tower page instead of merging? NSMB's fortresses may be towers, but the SMB3, SMW, and end of level fortresses are not. [[User:DonnyKD|DonnyKD]] ([[User talk:DonnyKD|talk]]) 16:03, 6 December 2012 (EST) | ||
:I would personally vastly prefer the information on the end of level fortresses to be removed, regardless of whether this proposal passes. Covering them starts to seep into violating [[MarioWiki:Generic subjects]]. As for pre-''NSMB'' fortress levels, how are they different, than, say the towers of ''NSMBU''? -- [[User:1337star|1337star]] <sup>([[User talk:1337star|Mailbox SP]])</sup> 16:24, 6 December 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 17:24, December 6, 2012
Merge with Tower
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Monday, May 27, 2024, 23:55 GMT
I think that Tower and Fortress articles should be merged. They both serve the same purpose and the names are interchangeable. For example, in New Super Mario Bros. U they are called towers but look like fortresses.
Proposer: BluePiranha (talk)
Deadline: December 20, 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support
- BluePiranha (talk) Per my proposal.
- 1337star (talk) Both are essentially the same level type (the mid-world or secret variant of the Castle). While that normally wouldn't be worth a merge to me, the fact that post-NSMB, fortresses became much like that game's Towers is enough for me to say merge 'em.
Oppose
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) No because they aren't the same a tower is not a fortress so they shouldn't be merged together even if they often play the same role.
- Coooool123 (talk) As much as I'm for merging articles, I'm going to have to disagree on this one. Fortresses are the things at the end of each level. Towers are the things that the koopalings are in.
Comments
Coooool123, read the fortress article. There are two types of fortresses. The ones at the end of levels and the ones that function like towers. BluePiranha (talk)
Actually, why don't we just move over the NSMB info to the tower page instead of merging? NSMB's fortresses may be towers, but the SMB3, SMW, and end of level fortresses are not. DonnyKD (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2012 (EST)
- I would personally vastly prefer the information on the end of level fortresses to be removed, regardless of whether this proposal passes. Covering them starts to seep into violating MarioWiki:Generic subjects. As for pre-NSMB fortress levels, how are they different, than, say the towers of NSMBU? -- 1337star (Mailbox SP) 16:24, 6 December 2012 (EST)
