MarioWiki talk:Courtesy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Because admins are highly trustworthy users that have proven to be consistently reliable editors. They are given powers used to watch over the wiki and prevent vandalism and the like. And I believe that if an admin is making a mistake or something, the situation is taken care of internally, so there's no reason a normal user would have to give an admin a warning. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | :Because admins are highly trustworthy users that have proven to be consistently reliable editors. They are given powers used to watch over the wiki and prevent vandalism and the like. And I believe that if an admin is making a mistake or something, the situation is taken care of internally, so there's no reason a normal user would have to give an admin a warning. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | ||
::If you see an admin doing something wrong, approach them about it or talk to another admin and that admin will bring it up with the administration. Admins aren't disciplined the same way other users are as they can easily unban themselves, their punishments are in the form of demotions. The Warning templates are ban templates. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | ::If you see an admin doing something wrong, approach them about it or talk to another admin and that admin will bring it up with the administration. Admins aren't disciplined the same way other users are as they can easily unban themselves, their punishments are in the form of demotions. The Warning templates are ban templates. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | ||
It doesn't answer my other question. Just exactly what is so God damn good about administrators compared to normal users?[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 10:44, 3 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 11:44, December 3, 2011
Why can't we give Warnings to an administrator if they can give us warnings? Just exactly what is so god damn good about administrators compared to normal users?Mr Man 16:26, 25 November 2011 (EST)
Well the administrator's run the site, plus they know what not to do. Donaldthescotishtwin
- Because admins are highly trustworthy users that have proven to be consistently reliable editors. They are given powers used to watch over the wiki and prevent vandalism and the like. And I believe that if an admin is making a mistake or something, the situation is taken care of internally, so there's no reason a normal user would have to give an admin a warning. Bop1996 (Talk)
- If you see an admin doing something wrong, approach them about it or talk to another admin and that admin will bring it up with the administration. Admins aren't disciplined the same way other users are as they can easily unban themselves, their punishments are in the form of demotions. The Warning templates are ban templates.
( | )
- If you see an admin doing something wrong, approach them about it or talk to another admin and that admin will bring it up with the administration. Admins aren't disciplined the same way other users are as they can easily unban themselves, their punishments are in the form of demotions. The Warning templates are ban templates.
It doesn't answer my other question. Just exactly what is so God damn good about administrators compared to normal users?Mr Man 10:44, 3 December 2011 (EST)
