MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
Luigibros2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Son of Suns}} - I oppose for a number of reasons. First, we already have those pages - [[References]], [[Video game references]], [[Television references]], etc. Second, besides those references made by Nintendo, all others are unofficial, and unless they are extremely notable, we don't need to keep track of everything. References made by other companies and fans are just as unofficial, and they either shouldn't be covered by this wiki or every piece of Mario fan work should also be included. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== |
Revision as of 13:47, December 16, 2008
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed using the code {{user|User name}}. Signing with the signature code ~~~(~) is not allowed due to technical issues. How To
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after work/school, weekend nights). If a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours.
New FeaturesMario Cameos Outside of Mario Games PageI have recently been reading a lot of online stuff and watching a lot of television stuff. Also I have been playing some non Mario and non Nintendo games seeing Mario and other characters appearances. I think that we should make a page that states the cameos of all the Mario characters in Telivision and other Game Media. Please support me in this. Proposer Luigibros2 SupportOppose
CommentsRemovalsBowser FA NominationIt has come to my attention that the Featured Article nomination for Bowser is a dreadful mess. Since it's been around for over a year (September 2007!), many of the opposes are out of date or from retired users, which make them very difficult to remove. Although personally I think the Bowser article is too long to be Featured (it needs to be condensed), the FA Nomination page should be deleted and it should be nominated again later (after a bit of revising, of course). Proposer: Daniel Webster (talk) Support
Oppose
CommentsTime Q: Hardly anyone is using those so nothing is getting done and the poor page is stuck in limbo. Daniel Webster (talk) 08:16, 15 December 2008 (EST) Stumpers: I wouldn't be so sure, considering that deletion request thing was up there a couple months with no activity. This proposal will probably bring to mind the page, but it was dormant for quite a while. Just my two cents... InfectedShroom (talk) PS: thanks, Stoobs, for correcting my stupid sig habit. :P
Uh... am I missing something, or is Leirin's vote not really referring to Daniel's point? Time Q (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2008 (EST) Splits & MergesNone at the moment. ChangesNone at the moment. MiscellaneousNone at the moment. |