16,776
edits
MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive: Difference between revisions
→Big Super Mario Fan
m (Text replacement - "Appeals/Archive Template" to "Appeals/Archive/Template") |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
====Toadette the Achiever==== | ====Toadette the Achiever==== | ||
*I know that edit sniping means performing an action before the person ''meant'' to perform the action can even '''do''' anything. To be honest, I don't think it was obvious enough that Wildgoosespeeder was trying to archive his latest proposal at the time '''''I''''' was trying to archive it as well. Even if it actually was, there were many informal ways he could have addressed the situation, rather than jumping straight to a Reminder. | *I know that edit sniping means performing an action before the person ''meant'' to perform the action can even '''do''' anything. To be honest, I don't think it was obvious enough that Wildgoosespeeder was trying to archive his latest proposal at the time '''''I''''' was trying to archive it as well. Even if it actually was, there were many informal ways he could have addressed the situation, rather than jumping straight to a Reminder. | ||
:<small>P.S.: From now on, when archiving appeals, please use the [[Template:AppealOutcome|AppealOutcome]] template to address the outcome. [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 46#Expand the "Outcome template" rule to appeal outcomes|This proposal]] dictates it.</small> | :<small>P.S.: From now on, when archiving appeals, please use the [[Template:AppealOutcome|AppealOutcome]] template to address the outcome. [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/46#Expand the "Outcome template" rule to appeal outcomes|This proposal]] dictates it.</small> | ||
====Wildgoosespeeder==== | ====Wildgoosespeeder==== | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
*[[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder#Aboutfile template]] | *[[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder#Aboutfile template]] | ||
====Wildgoosespeeder==== | ====Wildgoosespeeder==== | ||
*{{tem|aboutfile-reminder}} is for people that have {{tem|aboutfile}} inserted, but never filled out from the default when [[Special:Upload]] is accessed or never corrected within a reasonable amount of time by the uploader. It is not required to have the template inserted but it is recommended. In fact, there was [[PipeProject:Adding Aboutfile | *{{tem|aboutfile-reminder}} is for people that have {{tem|aboutfile}} inserted, but never filled out from the default when [[Special:Upload]] is accessed or never corrected within a reasonable amount of time by the uploader. It is not required to have the template inserted but it is recommended. In fact, there was [[PipeProject:Adding Aboutfile template|an abandoned project]] related to it. I have been doing this for a long time. | ||
====MarioMario456==== | ====MarioMario456==== | ||
*Sometimes, the contributor forgots to add the {{tem|aboutfile}} template. | *Sometimes, the contributor forgots to add the {{tem|aboutfile}} template. | ||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
====Keyblade Master==== | ====Keyblade Master==== | ||
Actually, it was mainly because of the templates why I issued the reminder, since I explained what conjectural templates are for prior to doing so but BigBowserBoss continued to put it on articles which had official names which is why I put a reminder there. The links really didn't have much to do with it, I just happened to leave a message regarding that in a different edit. And I wouldn't issue a warning without contacting an admin first. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 07:08, March 6, 2021 (EST) | Actually, it was mainly because of the templates why I issued the reminder, since I explained what conjectural templates are for prior to doing so but BigBowserBoss continued to put it on articles which had official names which is why I put a reminder there. The links really didn't have much to do with it, I just happened to leave a message regarding that in a different edit. And I wouldn't issue a warning without contacting an admin first. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 07:08, March 6, 2021 (EST) | ||
---- | |||
===Super Mario RPG=== | |||
{{AppealOutcome|lastwarn|amended|While the team agrees that Super Mario RPG has been making sweeping changes without prior discussion and was notified a couple of times, which was the primary reason for the lastwarn, some of the changes have been beneficial. The user has been overall constructive and civil dealing with the matters and has been responsive to criticism. We decided to give this user another chance, so the last warning is downgraded to a warning. {{User|Mario}} 15:31, February 9, 2024 (EST)}} | |||
[[User talk:Super Mario RPG#Last Warning]] | |||
====Super Mario RPG==== | |||
I'm requesting to appeal my final warning because it did not concern much else than me renaming the "Missions" section on Olympic Games pages to "Profiles and statistics," or adding "Tips" and "Tutorials" under that scope. Otherwise, it was vague, and even contradictory when considering the issuer liked my Missions table. Two users disagreed with the last warning, but one felt that at least minimum effort of discussion was needed before creating several of these templates I've been making. When I saw the issuer undo my edits to the Missions sections of Olympic Games events, I took the effort to manually rename all of the sections back to "Missions" and undid myself on one of the Rio 2016 arcade event pages. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 13:09, February 4, 2024 (EST) | |||
====BBQ Turtle==== | |||
The warning was not given just for the "Profiles and Statistics" issue, it was due to the fact that the user has continued to make sweeping changes without much, if any, discussion or explanation first, and has been warned for doing it before. Multiple users have expressed concern about this practice, and the warning was discussed with other administration staff before being issued. [[User:BBQ Turtle|BBQ Turtle]] ([[User talk:BBQ Turtle|talk]]) 16:20, February 4, 2024 (EST) | |||
---- | |||
===Arthur2=== | |||
{{AppealOutcome|reminder|stands|It is clear that Arthur2 broke rules and the sysops explained so. Furthermore, Arthur2 has not made a detailed case explaining exactly why these warnings were mistaken nor are their claims supported by any evidence. Please read the warnings by Nightwicked Bowser/Mario jc carefully. {{User|Mario}} 21:36, May 6, 2024 (EDT)}} | |||
*[[User talk:Arthur2#Kracka]] | |||
*[[User talk:Arthur2#Reminder]] | |||
====Arthur2==== | |||
*It is not purpose. (Anoymous edits are not anoymous me) | |||
====Nightwicked Bowser/Mario jc==== | |||
*Arthur2 already had informal messages about [[Kracka]] to Kabooma and about edit warring before the warning was given, as for the reminder the IP Mario Jc links to is Arthur2's IP. | |||
*Mario jc: Can confirm the anonymous IP matches your account and they're even the same type of edits. The reminder was valid, as was Nightwick's warning, as I've previously told you not to [[User talk:Arthur2#Pengaccha 1-gō|add names without providing a source]] and [[User talk:Arthur2#Pengaccha 1-gō|repeatedly redo your edits]]. Regarding the reverts: you actively undid a series of edits; I would not call those "not on purpose". | |||
---- | |||
===Big Super Mario Fan=== | |||
{{AppealOutcome|last warning|stands|[[Special:Diff/4213510|This edit]] in [[Mario & Luigi (series)]] was an attempt to enact an ongoing proposal (which is also being heavily opposed) on including original games and ports / remakes in one list in series articles. [[Special:Diff/4210269|A similar edit]] was also attempted in [[Super Mario (series)]] prior to starting the proposal which resulted in a warning for making huge changes without discussing. {{User:Nightwicked Bowser/sig}} 14:26, May 18, 2024 (EDT)}} | |||
*[[User talk:Big Super Mario Fan#Last warning]] | |||
====Big Super Mario Fan==== | |||
*This final warning was completely unnecessary. Because the games where all listet from oldest to newest already. I just put them in one section. This has nothing to do with a proposal. Those remakes where already in the right order. I didn't Chance that. Those "drastic changes" for NSMB. U may have been to much. But now they are using some things that I did. So I was still helpful. A lastwarn is for no reason valid. Because I never have a bad intention when I edit. I always try to help. | |||
====Mario==== | |||
*Outlined in the warning message, you have made changes that integrated the remake with the main series[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_%26_Luigi_(series)&oldid=4213496] which is identical to what you were attempting to effect from an ongoing proposal[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Proposals&diff=prev&oldid=4210283]. This is still breaking the rules, and you should be aware of the proposals you make while you are making changes. That being said, even if the last warning isn't legitimate, you are still under two warnings for making drastic changes without discussion as well as inappropriate formatting in your comment, so a lastwarn, for a different reason, should still be valid. | |||
---- | |||