395,883
edits
MarioWiki:Good writing: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "http://www.mariowiki.com" to "https://www.mariowiki.com"
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "http://www.mariowiki.com" to "https://www.mariowiki.com") |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The goal of the Super Mario Wiki is to provide a complete, comprehensive, and ''well-written'' account of the [[Mario (franchise)|''Mario'' franchise]]. This need for quality goes beyond merely using proper grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. The content itself also has to be good, which is accomplished for the most part. However, there ''are'' a few issues that frequently come up with the writing. This is a guide to help users try to avoid these pitfalls. | The goal of the Super Mario Wiki is to provide a complete, comprehensive, and ''well-written'' account of the [[Super Mario (franchise)|''Super Mario'' franchise]]. This need for quality goes beyond merely using proper grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. The content itself also has to be good, which is accomplished for the most part. However, there ''are'' a few issues that frequently come up with the writing. This is a guide to help users try to avoid these pitfalls. | ||
==Bad writing== | ==Bad writing== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Flowery writing''' – Overly fancy writing looks forced and is distracting to the reader. Repetition is bad, but abusing the thesaurus and using too many adjectives is just as undesirable. | *'''Flowery writing''' – Overly fancy writing looks forced and is distracting to the reader. Repetition is bad, but abusing the thesaurus and using too many adjectives is just as undesirable. | ||
*'''Epic writing''' – Grandiose, over-the-top dramatic prose does not make games sound more epic and interesting. It just makes the articles tiring to read. Keep it level-headed when writing summaries. | *'''Epic writing''' – Grandiose, over-the-top dramatic prose does not make games sound more epic and interesting. It just makes the articles tiring to read. Keep it level-headed when writing summaries. | ||
*'''Grimdark''' – There may be a few interesting instances in which ''Mario'' gets serious, but don't fixate on them: blowing stuff out of proportion just skews our coverage and lowers the wiki's credibility. | *'''Grimdark''' – There may be a few interesting instances in which ''Super Mario'' gets serious, but don't fixate on them: blowing stuff out of proportion just skews our coverage and lowers the wiki's credibility. | ||
*'''Reading between the lines''' – The articles are for facts, not speculation. Keep original interpretations and personal biases out of the writing. | *'''Reading between the lines''' – The articles are for facts, not speculation. Keep original interpretations and personal biases out of the writing. | ||
*'''Unsupported analysis''' – Some things in the ''Mario'' | *'''Unsupported analysis''' – Some things in the ''Super Mario'' franchise are left ambiguous and making a few straightforward inferences is better than nothing, as long as it's supported by quotes and references, and is presented as being "implied" (etc.) and not fact. | ||
*'''Judgement calls''' – There is also a lot of contradictory material in the ''Mario'' | *'''Judgement calls''' – There is also a lot of contradictory material in the ''Super Mario'' franchise, but don't make assertions about which story is true or false. Just present them both and note which one is more recent or more widely adhered to in the games (if applicable). | ||
*'''Knitting everything together''' – By nature, most ''Mario'' games do not fit together into a cohesive timeline. Trying to link them together is speculation and should not be done. | *'''Knitting everything together''' – By nature, most ''Super Mario'' games do not fit together into a cohesive timeline. Trying to link them together is speculation and should not be done. | ||
*'''Fan worship''' – Character pages should not be bogged down by rambling essays and excessive details. That level of coverage and the way it's written is not thorough or informative, it's unprofessional and even off-putting at times. | *'''Fan worship''' – Character pages should not be bogged down by rambling essays and excessive details. That level of coverage and the way it's written is not thorough or informative, it's unprofessional and even off-putting at times. | ||
*'''Fusing gameplay and story elements''' – Don't treat the mechanics of gameplay as if they were part of a flowing narrative. Gameplay is gameplay, and trying to treat it like story is unnatural and lowers the quality of the article. | *'''Fusing gameplay and story elements''' – Don't treat the mechanics of gameplay as if they were part of a flowing narrative. Gameplay is gameplay, and trying to treat it like story is unnatural and lowers the quality of the article. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Several users fall in the trap of thinking that short sections or articles are automatically "stubs", and thus, "bad". In reality, there's a difference between stubs (short articles that are missing information and could be expanded) and sections/articles that are short because the subject itself is short, simplistic, or otherwise. If there is not much to write about, by all means, that section or article ''should'' be short, rather than filled with off-topic or unnecessarily verbose padding. | Several users fall in the trap of thinking that short sections or articles are automatically "stubs", and thus, "bad". In reality, there's a difference between stubs (short articles that are missing information and could be expanded) and sections/articles that are short because the subject itself is short, simplistic, or otherwise. If there is not much to write about, by all means, that section or article ''should'' be short, rather than filled with off-topic or unnecessarily verbose padding. | ||
Due to the often simplistic nature of non-RPG ''Mario'' games (particularly platformers), users often try to supplement these articles' short Story sections with world-by-world (or even level-by-level), boss-by-boss descriptions of the games. Story sections are not walkthroughs, and while it's well-meaning, this approach to summary-writing should be avoided at all costs. "''[[Princess Peach|Peach]] is kidnapped by [[Bowser]] and [[Mario]] sets off to rescue her.''" is plot. "''Mario traversed the grassy plains of World 1 and used Super Mushrooms, Fire Flowers, and rare Invincibility Stars to defeat new foes and challenge the False Bowser waiting for him at the castle.''" is not plot, it's cruft. | Due to the often simplistic nature of non-RPG ''Super Mario'' games (particularly platformers), users often try to supplement these articles' short Story sections with world-by-world (or even level-by-level), boss-by-boss descriptions of the games. Story sections are not walkthroughs, and while it's well-meaning, this approach to summary-writing should be avoided at all costs. "''[[Princess Peach|Peach]] is kidnapped by [[Bowser]] and [[Mario]] sets off to rescue her.''" is plot. "''Mario traversed the grassy plains of World 1 and used Super Mushrooms, Fire Flowers, and rare Invincibility Stars to defeat new foes and challenge the False Bowser waiting for him at the castle.''" is not plot, it's cruft. | ||
Similarly, character pages often make the mistake of describing the entire plot of a game instead of that particular character's role in it. It is okay to provide context for what the character's doing, and obviously how other characters interact with them is also relevant, but it should be kept to a minimum. Another thing to watch out for is the Mario-centric nature of the series bleeding into other characters' pages. It's a subtle difference, but "''Peach is kidnapped by [[Bowser]] and held in his castle until she is rescued by [[Mario]].''" keeps the focus on Peach and would be appropriate for her page's History section, while "''Peach is kidnapped by Bowser and Mario goes to rescue her.''" changes the focus to Mario's actions and would not be as ideal for Peach's article. | Similarly, character pages often make the mistake of describing the entire plot of a game instead of that particular character's role in it. It is okay to provide context for what the character's doing, and obviously how other characters interact with them is also relevant, but it should be kept to a minimum. Another thing to watch out for is the Mario-centric nature of the series bleeding into other characters' pages. It's a subtle difference, but "''Peach is kidnapped by [[Bowser]] and held in his castle until she is rescued by [[Mario]].''" keeps the focus on Peach and would be appropriate for her page's History section, while "''Peach is kidnapped by Bowser and Mario goes to rescue her.''" changes the focus to Mario's actions and would not be as ideal for Peach's article. | ||
===Everything but the kitchen sink=== | ===Everything but the kitchen sink=== | ||
One common form of padding is when users try to make articles a bit too thorough and end up describing things or events that are only superficially similar to what the page is about. For example, [[Mini Mario (form)|Mini Mario]] is a specific form that appears in the ''[[New Super Mario Bros.]]'' series with specific abilities. The page for it should not [ | One common form of padding is when users try to make articles a bit too thorough and end up describing things or events that are only superficially similar to what the page is about. For example, [[Mini Mario (form)|Mini Mario]] is a specific form that appears in the ''[[New Super Mario Bros.]]'' series with specific abilities. The page for it should not [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mini_Mario&diff=1359932&oldid=1359536 feature every instances of Mario being shrunk in some way], although briefly mentioning in the introduction that he's been shrunk in ways besides the Mini Mario form is acceptable. Similarly, [[Baby Mario]] is a specific entity, and his page should not list every time Mario is shown as an infant in other ''Super Mario'' medias (unless, of course, those appearances are based on ''the'' "Baby Mario" the page is about). However, like the Mini Mario example, a short paragraph in the introduction summarizing the other baby appearances would ensure the article is indeed exhaustive and won't appear to simply be missing the extra info, but at the same time, limiting it to a paragraph or less means the article doesn't get cluttered up by users writing detailed sections about everything but the kitchen sink. | ||
This issue often overlaps with [[MarioWiki:Generic subjects]], which addresses the problem of users writing about every appearance of a generic real world item or animal appearing in ''Mario'' media, rather than limiting the scope of the article to appearances in which the subject has a specific function, and isn't simply acting as it does in real life and is not key to the gameplay and/or story. For example, the [[Boomerang]] page is about the power-up in the series and should not list every generic instance of boomerangs being used in the ''Mario'' franchise, although acknowledging that generic boomerangs appear in various other installments in the ''Mario'' | This issue often overlaps with [[MarioWiki:Generic subjects]], which addresses the problem of users writing about every appearance of a generic real world item or animal appearing in ''Super Mario'' media, rather than limiting the scope of the article to appearances in which the subject has a specific function, and isn't simply acting as it does in real life and is not key to the gameplay and/or story. For example, the [[Boomerang]] page is about the power-up in the series and should not list every generic instance of boomerangs being used in the ''Super Mario'' franchise, although acknowledging that generic boomerangs appear in various other installments in the ''Super Mario'' franchise is fine. | ||
===Captain Obvious=== | ===Captain Obvious=== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Overly fancy language is the worst offender – to put it simply, it feels forced. To use the ''Luigi's Mansion'' quotation form earlier as an example, there's no good reason to call a ghost baby a "cherubim", just call him a "baby", or change things up with normal synonyms like "infant". Flowery language often goes hand-in-hand with attempts to inject a sense of "epicness" to the content, and using grandiose and overly-dramatic language is just as bad as run-of-the mill thesaurus regurgitation. There is no need to fill the pages with superlatives about how heroic a character is, or how harrowing their situation is, or whatever. | Overly fancy language is the worst offender – to put it simply, it feels forced. To use the ''Luigi's Mansion'' quotation form earlier as an example, there's no good reason to call a ghost baby a "cherubim", just call him a "baby", or change things up with normal synonyms like "infant". Flowery language often goes hand-in-hand with attempts to inject a sense of "epicness" to the content, and using grandiose and overly-dramatic language is just as bad as run-of-the mill thesaurus regurgitation. There is no need to fill the pages with superlatives about how heroic a character is, or how harrowing their situation is, or whatever. | ||
Similarly, users sometimes fixate on the darker aspects of ''Mario'' plots and blow things way out of proportion. Yes, [[Dimentio]] turning out to be a psychotic puppetmaster who wants to wipe all of reality out of existence is interesting and serious stuff, but it does not require half a dozen pages to adequately cover this one-time character. Similarly, while Bowser ''does'' make a habit of invading the Mushroom Kingdom, saying he's a ruthless, bloodthirsty tyrant who threatens hundreds of lives with his incessant violent attacks is going a little too far. This is ''Mario'' we're dealing with after all. It's fine to take it seriously if you want, but keep the heavy-handed dramatic prose off the articles. | Similarly, users sometimes fixate on the darker aspects of ''Super Mario'' plots and blow things way out of proportion. Yes, [[Dimentio]] turning out to be a psychotic puppetmaster who wants to wipe all of reality out of existence is interesting and serious stuff, but it does not require half a dozen pages to adequately cover this one-time character. Similarly, while Bowser ''does'' make a habit of invading the Mushroom Kingdom, saying he's a ruthless, bloodthirsty tyrant who threatens hundreds of lives with his incessant violent attacks is going a little too far. This is ''Super Mario'' we're dealing with after all. It's fine to take it seriously if you want, but keep the heavy-handed dramatic prose off the articles. | ||
===Reading between the lines=== | ===Reading between the lines=== | ||
Just as making things grittier than they need to be isn't desirable, so too should users avoid reading too much into the games and coming up with original interpretations of characters and events. Articles must be based on facts, not speculation, and personal biases must be set aside when writing. If you prefer Luigi over Mario, that's fine, but don't waste your time writing a section about how the latter is a mindless force of destructive goodness while his underappreciated brother is the real hero who has the harder task of vanquishing his various inner demons and personal shortcomings, because that material will not last long on the wiki. | Just as making things grittier than they need to be isn't desirable, so too should users avoid reading too much into the games and coming up with original interpretations of characters and events. Articles must be based on facts, not speculation, and personal biases must be set aside when writing. If you prefer Luigi over Mario, that's fine, but don't waste your time writing a section about how the latter is a mindless force of destructive goodness while his underappreciated brother is the real hero who has the harder task of vanquishing his various inner demons and personal shortcomings, because that material will not last long on the wiki. | ||
That being said, analysis and dissection are not inherently bad if they're kept to a minimum. There are admittedly some things included in the ''Mario'' | That being said, analysis and dissection are not inherently bad if they're kept to a minimum. There are admittedly some things included in the ''Super Mario'' franchise that are left somewhat ambiguous (i.e. the various character backstories hinted at in ''Super Paper Mario''), and it is better to have something rather than nothing about these aspects. But keep in mind that the interpretations ''must'' be straightforward and logical, backed up with solid references (i.e. the original quotes from the games or related material), and explicitly stated to be "implied" or "hinted at" (etc.), rather than passed off as solid fact. | ||
However, this does not mean that users should go out of their way to resolve contradicting information or try to link unrelated events and games together into one cohesive narrative. If there is a contradiction, simply provide both stories and comment on how they conflict without giving more credence to one version over the other, unless one is clearly anomalous when compared to all other relevant info (i.e. a single game guide mislabeling one enemy as another, etc.), although references should still be provided. Straightforward resolutions are not always easy to come by, however, since in most cases, ''Mario'' games do not link together (except in the recycling of main characters, generic enemies, items and places; occasionally, cameos and other nods and references to early games may also be included). Therefore, [ | However, this does not mean that users should go out of their way to resolve contradicting information or try to link unrelated events and games together into one cohesive narrative. If there is a contradiction, simply provide both stories and comment on how they conflict without giving more credence to one version over the other, unless one is clearly anomalous when compared to all other relevant info (i.e. a single game guide mislabeling one enemy as another, etc.), although references should still be provided. Straightforward resolutions are not always easy to come by, however, since in most cases, ''Super Mario'' games do not link together (except in the recycling of main characters, generic enemies, items and places; occasionally, cameos and other nods and references to early games may also be included). Therefore, [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mario&oldid=764279#Super_Mario_Bros.:_The_Lost_Levels users should not try to string things together into solid timelines], as this is just as speculative as choosing a side when it comes to contradictions. Users must remember that while there is no official ''Super Mario'' timeline, it ''is'' possible to create overviews of characters that are coherent and logically arranged without getting ambitious and speculative about it. | ||
===Fan worship=== | ===Fan worship=== | ||
A specialized form of delving too deep into the material and giving a disproportional amount of coverage to certain aspects of the ''Mario'' | A specialized form of delving too deep into the material and giving a disproportional amount of coverage to certain aspects of the ''Super Mario'' franchise is when a character's appreciative fans go overboard in crafting their article. For example, it does not take pages and pages of cruft to describe Peach's dress or the game-by-game evolution of [[Princess Daisy|Daisy]]'s appearance, specific sections do not need to be written about Bowser's common sense or his more sympathetic instances of emotion, and as mentioned before, one-off characters like Dimentio do not merit entire essays for their histories and personalities. Like other types of padding, going into too much detail bogs the pages down and makes them hard to read, and in some cases, the level of attention being paid to certain characters (typically female ones, for one reason or another) can even come off as a bit creepy and off-putting. Everyone who edits the wiki is a fan of the series and its characters. However, when it comes to the actual writing, users must be sure to keep it professional. | ||
===Trying to fuse game mechanics and story elements=== | ===Trying to fuse game mechanics and story elements=== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
;'''Acronym''': "Acronym" refers to abbreviations that are intended to be pronounced as words. However, it is commonly misused to refer to abbreviations in general. | ;'''Acronym''': "Acronym" refers to abbreviations that are intended to be pronounced as words. However, it is commonly misused to refer to abbreviations in general. | ||
;'''Beta''': "Beta" refers to the period in software development where a product is feature-complete, but has yet to be extensively bug-tested or optimized. This usually happens long after things like concepts being rejected, characters being cut from the game, etc. "Beta" should '''not''' be used as a shorthand for "things that changed during development". More precise terms such as "cut," "unused," "concept art", or simply "early" should be used instead. Of course, this does not apply if the information is confirmed to be from an ''actual'' beta build. | ;'''Beta''': "Beta" refers to the period in software development where a product is feature-complete, but has yet to be extensively bug-tested or optimized. This usually happens long after things like concepts being rejected, characters being cut from the game, etc. "Beta" should '''not''' be used as a shorthand for "things that changed during development". More precise terms such as "cut," "unused," "concept art", or simply "early" should be used instead. Of course, this does not apply if the information is confirmed to be from an ''actual'' beta build. | ||
;'''Brain Washing and mind control''': These two terms are interchangeably used even in the ''Mario'' franchise, but they have distinct meanings. "Brain washing" is closer to persuasion, manipulation, and coercion while "mind control" refers to more forceful subjugating, possessing, and commanding a character's brain and personality. While "mind control" is limited to fictional works, brain washing can happen in real life such as people joining cults or believing in outlandish conspiracy theories. In ''Super Paper Mario'', for instance the use of [[Floro Sprout]]s is described as "brainwashing" when the more accurate term is "mind control". | |||
;'''Outer space''': "Outer space" generally refers to the open, near-empty space outside the gravitational sphere of any celestial body. However, it is misconstrued to say that every location with the comical black "starry sky" background is in outer space, as the games mostly treat it as a backdrop of some sorts, such as the case with [[Gravity Galaxy]]. To add to the illogicalities, some locations are only temporarily in outer space, such as [[Peach's Castle]] during the events of ''[[Paper Mario]]'' and ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]''. "Cosmic," on the other hand, refers to something pertaining to outer space, and should be used instead in most cases. | ;'''Outer space''': "Outer space" generally refers to the open, near-empty space outside the gravitational sphere of any celestial body. However, it is misconstrued to say that every location with the comical black "starry sky" background is in outer space, as the games mostly treat it as a backdrop of some sorts, such as the case with [[Gravity Galaxy]]. To add to the illogicalities, some locations are only temporarily in outer space, such as [[Peach's Castle]] during the events of ''[[Paper Mario]]'' and ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]''. "Cosmic," on the other hand, refers to something pertaining to outer space, and should be used instead in most cases. | ||
;'''Prequel''': A "prequel" is a work released as part of an established series whose narrative is chronologically set before another, ''previously released'' work. However, it's frequently misused to say, "The previous game in the series." ''[[Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island]]'' is a prequel to ''[[Super Mario Bros.]]'', but ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]'' is ''not'' a prequel to ''[[Super Mario Galaxy 2]]''. Most usages of it on the wiki should be substituted with "predecessor". | ;'''Prequel''': A "prequel" is a work released as part of an established series whose narrative is chronologically set before another, ''previously released'' work. However, it's frequently misused to say, "The previous game in the series." ''[[Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island]]'' is a prequel to ''[[Super Mario Bros.]]'', but ''[[Super Mario Galaxy]]'' is ''not'' a prequel to ''[[Super Mario Galaxy 2]]''. Most usages of it on the wiki should be substituted with "predecessor". | ||
;'''Remix''': "Remix" is frequently used to refer to a new recording of a music track, when the proper term for that would be "arrangement." A remix uses the original recording and modifies it (such as by altering the pitch, adding new percussions and beats, etc.) while a rearrangement is a new recording of an existing composition. | ;'''Remix''': "Remix" is frequently used to refer to a new recording of a music track, when the proper term for that would be "arrangement." A remix uses the original recording and modifies it (such as by altering the pitch, adding new percussions and beats, etc.) while a rearrangement is a new recording of an existing composition. | ||
;'''Sprites''': "Sprite" refers to pre-rendered graphics, but it is often used to refer to any graphical assets in games with a 2D playing field, including ones such as ''[[New Super Mario Bros. Wii]]'', where almost all graphics are live-rendered 3D models. Of course, ''pre-rendered'' 3D graphics can be sprites (such as with ''[[Donkey Kong Country]]'' and ''[[Yoshi's Story]]''). | ;'''Sprites''': "Sprite" refers to pre-rendered graphics, but it is often used to refer to any graphical assets in games with a 2D playing field, including ones such as ''[[New Super Mario Bros. Wii]]'', where almost all graphics are live-rendered 3D models. Of course, ''pre-rendered'' 3D graphics can be sprites (such as with ''[[Donkey Kong Country]]'' and ''[[Yoshi's Story]]''). | ||
;'''Subspecies''': In science, "subspecies" (or "sub-species") denotes different populations of a species that are genetically, geographically, and/or physically distinct to an extent, yet still similar enough for interbreeding to occur freely when possible. However, it is often misused to label different species that are merely similar and/or based on one another, such as calling [[Lakitu]]s or [[Shady Koopa]]s subspecies of [[Koopa Troopa]]s. In reality, there are very few cases in the ''Mario'' | ;'''Subspecies''': In science, "subspecies" (or "sub-species") denotes different populations of a species that are genetically, geographically, and/or physically distinct to an extent, yet still similar enough for interbreeding to occur freely when possible. However, it is often misused to label different species that are merely similar and/or based on one another, such as calling [[Lakitu]]s or [[Shady Koopa]]s subspecies of [[Koopa Troopa]]s. In reality, there are very few cases in the ''Super Mario'' franchise where enemies are similar enough to potentially be subspecies (i.e. red and blue [[Spike Top]]s in ''Paper Mario''), and even then, since their evolutionary history, genetics and breeding biology are unknown, it would still be speculation to definitively label anything as "subspecies." Instead, "species" should be used for everything, and similarities should simply be discussed in terms of "related," "derived" or "parent species." | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 88: | Line 89: | ||
*[[MarioWiki:Trivia]] | *[[MarioWiki:Trivia]] | ||
*[[MarioWiki:Citations]] | *[[MarioWiki:Citations]] | ||
{{ | {{MarioWiki}} | ||
{{Shortcut| | {{Shortcut|SMW:GW|SMW:GOOD|SMW:BAD}} | ||
[[Category:Writing guidelines]] | [[Category:Writing guidelines]] | ||