Talk:Princess Peach: Showtime!: Difference between revisions

Talk:Princess Peach: Showtime! (edit)

Revision as of 19:15, April 28, 2024

2,466 bytes added , 1 month ago

→‎Oppose

EvieMaybe

456

edits

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 Can we add a alphabet for the in game ancient language [[Special:Contributions/174.242.40.57|174.242.40.57]] 12:45, April 6, 2024 (EDT)
+:Presuming it's about the stone exhibitions in [[The Case of the Missing Mural]], I personally think it'd be impractical at best, even more so as there's no sounds associated with those letters. Same unfortunately goes for what is apparently the [[Theet]]s' current-day written language, which is used in e.g. the newspaper Peach reads in [[The Case of the Rainy-Day Plot]], and in some of Sparkle Theater's posters. [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:14, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
 ==Replace the level list on the main Princess Peach: Showtime! page with a link to, or incorporation of, the Sparkle Theater page==
@@ Line 98: / Line 99: @@
 ===Option 1: Replace the entire Showtime page's list with a link to Sparkle Theater===
-This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main page:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly:
+This is one I know from Wikipedia, which has a concept of "Main article:". The way I think of it, the entire "Plays" section would be replaced with a "Main article:", for example, if I remember Wikipedia's syntaxing correctly:
 <code><nowiki>==Plays==</nowiki></code><br>
 <code><nowiki>{{Main|Sparkle Theater}}</nowiki></code><br><br>
@@ Line 113: / Line 114: @@
 ====Oppose====
+#{{User|Nightwicked Bowser}} Game articles typically include full level lists regardless if there are other articles that list them, including all Super Mario platformer articles.
+#{{User|ExoRosalina}} Is this even necessary? Some plays have better options just like in other platformer pages. I have yet checked Super Mario Galaxy (including 2) have both levels and Galaxy page have those similar issues.
+#{{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} Per above. Also, there is no option choosing.
+#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all.
+#{{User|FanOfRosalina2007}} Per all.
+#{{User|EvieMaybe}} if this passed, would we also take the levels out of SM3DW's page and put them in the sprixie kingdom page?
 ====Comments====
+Uhhh, this proposal doesn't let you choose which option they want. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|talk]]) 08:15, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
+:I had to guess a fair bit for what the format for my first ever talk page proposal would be, and [[MarioWiki:Proposals#Basic_proposal_and_support.2Foppose_format]] didn't seem to account for multi-option procedures, sadly. 😓 [[User:DandelionSprout|DandelionSprout]] ([[User talk:DandelionSprout|talk]]) 11:09, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
+::You don't have to keep the format as provided on the Proposals page word-for-word: you can change a few things that befit your proposal better as you set it up. Looking at previous multiple-option proposals, for example, you can replace the Support and Oppose sections with an "Option 1" section, an "Option 2" section, and a "Do nothing" section. {{User:Arend/sig}} 12:07, April 26, 2024 (EDT)
+:::Yeah, you don't HAVE to. When I make multi-option proposals, I put in the initial format, then change it to fit the proposal. [[User:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)]] ([[User talk:SONIC123CDMANIA+&#38;K(B&#38;ATSA)|talk]]) 13:49, April 26, 2024 (EDT)